Shaari Ariana L, Bhalla Shreya, Xu Annie, Patel Aman, Filimonov Andrey, Hsueh Wayne, Eloy Jean Anderson
Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey USA.
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey USA.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):601-603. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-05161-1. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) platforms such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini have progressed at a rapid pace. To allow for optimal medical outcomes and patient safety, it is crucial that patients have clearly written post-operative instructions. Patients are increasingly turning to AI platforms for medical information. Our objective was to evaluate the ability of ChatGPT versus Gemini to develop accurate and understandable post-operative instructions for patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Postoperative instructions on ESS, balloon sinuplasty, Caldwell Luc surgery, and septoplasty were generated using ChatGPT and Gemini. Measures of readability were calculated. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool was utilized to determine Understandability and Actionability. ChatGPT and Gemini were capable of generating understandable post-operative instructions but were poor for actionability and readability. While AI has a promising ability to generate accessible medical information, patients should be aware of its drawbacks especially when seeking postoperative instructions.
最近,ChatGPT和谷歌Gemini等人工智能(AI)平台发展迅速。为了实现最佳医疗效果和患者安全,为患者提供清晰的术后指导至关重要。患者越来越多地转向人工智能平台获取医疗信息。我们的目标是评估ChatGPT与Gemini为接受鼻内镜手术(ESS)的患者制定准确且易懂的术后指导的能力。使用ChatGPT和Gemini生成了关于ESS、球囊鼻窦成形术、柯-陆氏手术和鼻中隔成形术的术后指导。计算了可读性指标。利用患者教育材料评估工具来确定易懂性和可操作性。ChatGPT和Gemini能够生成易懂的术后指导,但在可操作性和可读性方面表现不佳。虽然人工智能在生成可获取的医疗信息方面具有广阔前景,但患者在寻求术后指导时应意识到其缺点。