Meiqi Gu, Zhe Xu, Yifei Li, Penghui Xiang, Zhen Wang, Rui Zhang, Fei Xin, Zhaohui Tang, Chengla Yi
Department of Traumatic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430000, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Mar 12;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05676-5.
Retrograde superior ramus screw of pubis (SRSP) is a new kind of pelvic minimally invasive internal fixation apparatus developed by our team. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical stability of this new minimally invasive pelvic internal fixation device, and to provide this new device with theoretical basis for clinical application.
The Tile C1.3 pelvic fracture model was established. The posterior ring was fixed in the same way with two sacroiliac screws. And the anterior ring was fixed with SRSP, reconstruction plate, minimal invasive subcutaneous internal fixator (INFIX) and hollow screw respectively, to establish the finite element model of fracture-internal fixation. Finite element analysis was used to analyze the deformation and Von Mises(V-M) stress distribution of different kind of fixation under three kinds of stress conditions: vertical self-weight load, anterior-posterior(A-P) compression and lateral compression.
Among the four-kind fixation models, all the maximum displacement of fracture site were significantly less than 2 cm, and the maximum V-M stress of internal fixation was lower than the yield stress of titanium metal (1050 MPa). The maximum displacement and V-M stress of total model/internal fixation in INFIX group were higher than those in the others under three stress conditions except for two cases, which were the maximum displacement of total model in SRSP group (0.26266 mm) under A-P compression and the maximum displacement of internal fixation in SRSP group (0.32588 mm) under lateral compression. The values of total model/internal fixation displacement and V-M stress distribution in SRSP group were similar to those of reconstructed plate group and hollow screw group. Furthermore, the stress distribution of SRSP group was more uniform from the stress nephogram.
All four kinds of internal fixation can effectively repair Tile C1.3 pelvic fractures. Also fracture-fixation pelvis model were basically restore the normal mechanical conduction path, rebuilding overall stability of the pelvic ring with good static mechanical stability. The stress distribution of fracture-internal fixation model in SRSP group was more uniform. Compared with INFIX group, SRSP group was more advantageous in preventing excessive displacement of the fracture site, loosening and deformation of the internal fixation, etc.
耻骨上支逆行螺钉(SRSP)是由本团队研发的一种新型骨盆微创内固定器械。本研究旨在分析这种新型骨盆微创内固定装置的生物力学稳定性,为该新型装置的临床应用提供理论依据。
建立Tile C1.3骨盆骨折模型。后环采用两枚骶髂螺钉以相同方式固定。前环分别采用SRSP、重建钢板、微创皮下内固定器(INFIX)和空心螺钉固定,建立骨折-内固定有限元模型。采用有限元分析方法,分析在垂直自重载荷、前后(A-P)压缩和侧方压缩三种应力条件下,不同固定方式下的变形及Von Mises(V-M)应力分布。
在四种固定模型中,骨折部位的最大位移均显著小于2 cm,内固定的最大V-M应力均低于钛金属屈服应力(1050 MPa)。除两种情况外,在三种应力条件下,INFIX组总模型/内固定的最大位移和V-M应力均高于其他组,这两种情况分别为A-P压缩下SRSP组总模型的最大位移(0.26266 mm)和侧方压缩下SRSP组内固定的最大位移(0.32588 mm)。SRSP组总模型/内固定位移值及V-M应力分布与重建钢板组和空心螺钉组相似。此外,从应力云图来看,SRSP组的应力分布更均匀。
四种内固定方式均能有效修复Tile C1.3骨盆骨折。骨折-固定骨盆模型基本恢复了正常的力学传导路径,重建了骨盆环的整体稳定性,具有良好的静态力学稳定性。SRSP组骨折-内固定模型的应力分布更均匀。与INFIX组相比,SRSP组在防止骨折部位过度位移、内固定松动及变形等方面更具优势。