Streram Sandya, Burrows Tracy, Duncan Mitch J, Hutchesson Melinda
School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Food and Nutrition Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Mar 11;22(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01718-7.
University students incur significantly elevated levels of stress compared to the general population and their non-student counterparts. Health risk behaviours are important modifiable determinants for the onset and aggravation of various mental health disorders, in which, university students generally exhibit poor engagement. Thus, this study aims to determine the efficacy of health behaviour interventions in relation to change in health behaviour and mental health outcomes, the impact of interventions (i.e., penetration, fidelity, and implementation), intervention characteristics associated with improved outcomes (efficacy) and the economic evaluation of interventions.
Six electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCT) published from the 1st January 2012 to 11th July 2023. Eligible RCTs included university students, evaluated behavioural interventions targeting health behaviours (i.e. dietary intake, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, alcohol use, substance use, smoking, and sleep) and reported a change in both health behaviour and mental health outcomes.
Twenty-two RCTs met the study inclusion criteria. Overall, only seven studies were effective in improving both health behaviour and mental health outcomes, with most (n = 4) focused on improving sleep behaviours. Insufficient evidence was found regarding intervention impact, intervention characteristics associated with improved outcomes and the economic evaluation of interventions to guide future implementation of health behaviour interventions in universities due to inadequate reporting of outcomes.
There is limited evidence regarding the efficacy of health behaviour interventions in improving both health behaviour and mental health outcomes. There is also insufficient evidence regarding intervention impact, intervention characteristics associated with improved outcomes and economic evaluation to guide the implementation of these interventions in the university setting.
与普通人群及其非学生同龄人相比,大学生承受着显著更高水平的压力。健康风险行为是各种心理健康障碍发生和加重的重要可改变决定因素,而大学生在这方面的参与度普遍较低。因此,本研究旨在确定健康行为干预在改变健康行为和心理健康结果方面的效果、干预的影响(即渗透率、保真度和实施情况)、与改善结果相关的干预特征(效果)以及干预的经济评估。
检索了六个电子数据库,以查找2012年1月1日至2023年7月11日发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。符合条件的RCT包括大学生,评估针对健康行为(即饮食摄入、体育活动、久坐行为、饮酒、物质使用、吸烟和睡眠)的行为干预,并报告了健康行为和心理健康结果的变化。
22项RCT符合研究纳入标准。总体而言,只有七项研究在改善健康行为和心理健康结果方面有效,其中大多数(n = 4)侧重于改善睡眠行为。由于结果报告不足,在干预影响、与改善结果相关的干预特征以及干预的经济评估方面,没有找到足够的证据来指导未来在大学中实施健康行为干预。
关于健康行为干预在改善健康行为和心理健康结果方面的效果,证据有限。在干预影响、与改善结果相关的干预特征以及经济评估方面,也没有足够的证据来指导在大学环境中实施这些干预。