• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价基于社区的健康促进的经济方面的局限性和潜力:批判性回顾。

The Limitations and Potentials of Evaluating Economic Aspects of Community-Based Health Promotion: A Critical Review.

机构信息

Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Gebbertstr. 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.

School of Business, Economics and Society, Chair of Health Management, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Lange Gasse 20, 90403, Nuremberg, Germany.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Mar;22(2):165-179. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y
PMID:38190019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10864521/
Abstract

Community-based health promotion (CBHP) interventions are promising approaches to address public health problems; however, their economic evaluation presents unique challenges. This review aims to explore the opportunities and limitations of evaluating economic aspects of CBHP, focusing on the assessment of intervention costs and outcomes, and the consideration of political-level changes and health equity. A systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science and PsycInfo databases identified 24 CBHP interventions, the majority of which targeted disadvantaged communities. Only five interventions included a detailed cost/resource assessment. Outcomes at the operational level were mainly quantitative, related to sociodemographics and environment or health status, while outcomes at the political level were often qualitative, related to public policy, capacity building or networks/collaboration. The study highlights the limitations of traditional health economic evaluation methods in capturing the complexity of CBHP interventions. It proposes the use of cost-consequence analysis (CCA) as a more comprehensive approach, offering a flexible and multifaceted assessment of costs and outcomes. However, challenges remain in the measurement and valuation of outcomes, equity considerations, intersectoral costs and attribution of effects. While CCA is a promising starting point, further research and methodological advancements are needed to refine its application and improve decision making in CBHP.

摘要

社区为基础的健康促进(CBHP)干预措施是解决公共卫生问题的有前途的方法;然而,它们的经济评估提出了独特的挑战。本综述旨在探讨评估 CBHP 经济方面的机会和局限性,重点关注干预成本和结果的评估,以及政治层面变化和健康公平的考虑。通过对 PubMed、Web of Science 和 PsycInfo 数据库的系统搜索,确定了 24 项 CBHP 干预措施,其中大多数针对弱势社区。只有五项干预措施包括详细的成本/资源评估。运营层面的结果主要是定量的,与社会人口统计学和环境或健康状况有关,而政治层面的结果通常是定性的,与公共政策、能力建设或网络/合作有关。该研究强调了传统健康经济评估方法在捕捉 CBHP 干预措施复杂性方面的局限性。它提出使用成本效益分析(CCA)作为一种更全面的方法,提供了对成本和结果的灵活和多方面评估。然而,在结果的衡量和估值、公平性考虑、跨部门成本和效果归因方面仍然存在挑战。虽然 CCA 是一个有前途的起点,但需要进一步的研究和方法学进展来完善其应用,并改善 CBHP 的决策制定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0896/10864521/92a06c7aec6f/40258_2023_864_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0896/10864521/92a06c7aec6f/40258_2023_864_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0896/10864521/92a06c7aec6f/40258_2023_864_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Limitations and Potentials of Evaluating Economic Aspects of Community-Based Health Promotion: A Critical Review.评价基于社区的健康促进的经济方面的局限性和潜力:批判性回顾。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Mar;22(2):165-179. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00864-y. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
2
[Community-based health promotion--a challenge for the evaluation].[基于社区的健康促进——评估面临的挑战]
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Feb;69(2):77-87. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-970146.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based, nurse-led health promotion for older people: a systematic review.基于家庭的、由护士主导的老年人健康促进的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(20):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta16200.
5
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders预防和治疗精神、神经及物质使用障碍的干预措施、政策和平台的成本效益及可负担性
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Economic evaluation of health promotion for older people-methodological problems and challenges.老年人健康促进的经济评估——方法学问题与挑战
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 5;16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):328. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1519-y.
8
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
9
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Community-Dwelling Older People Who Are Less Likely to Respond to Mail Surveys Under Infection Countermeasures for New Strains of Coronavirus: The Takasaki Study.新型冠状病毒新毒株感染防控措施下不太可能回复邮寄调查问卷的社区老年人特征:高崎研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Mar 16;22(3):437. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030437.
2
Health behaviour interventions to improve mental health outcomes for students in the university setting: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.改善大学环境中学生心理健康状况的健康行为干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Mar 11;22(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01718-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Equity in decline: fair distribution in a worse-off world.公平性在下降:在一个更加贫困的世界中的公平分配。
Lancet. 2023 Sep 16;402(10406):943-945. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01304-1. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
2
Multi-level stakeholders' perspectives on implementation and scaling up community-based health promotion in Germany.多层次利益相关者对德国社区健康促进实施和扩大的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad045.
3
The mental health and wellbeing impact of a Community Wealth Building programme in England: a difference-in-differences study.
英格兰社区财富建设计划对心理健康和福祉的影响:一项双重差分研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Jun;8(6):e403-e410. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00059-2. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
Preventive health resource allocation decision-making processes and the use of economic evidence in an Australian state government-A mixed methods study.澳大利亚州政府的预防性卫生资源分配决策过程和经济证据的使用——一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 19;17(9):e0274869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274869. eCollection 2022.
5
"For me, it's just a piece of freedom"-Increased empowerment through physical activity promotion among socially disadvantaged women.“对我来说,这只是自由的一部分”——通过促进社会劣势妇女的身体活动增强权能。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;10:867626. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.867626. eCollection 2022.
6
Development of a quantitative evaluation tool for Seoul's community-based participatory health program 'building healthy communities'.开发一种针对首尔社区参与式健康计划“建设健康社区”的定量评估工具。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Jun 23;37(Supplement_2):ii97-ii108. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac013.
7
Soft infrastructure: the critical community-level resources reportedly needed for program success.软基础设施:据报道,项目成功所需的关键社区层面资源。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 2;22(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12788-8.
8
Co-producing an action-oriented framework for community-based Physical Activity Promotion in Germany.合作制定德国以社区为基础的身体活动促进行动导向框架。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii93-ii106. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab159.
9
Toward the economic evaluation of participatory approaches in health promotion: lessons from four German physical activity promotion projects.迈向健康促进中参与式方法的经济评估:来自四个德国身体活动促进项目的经验教训。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_2):ii79-ii92. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab158.
10
A Practical Guide to Understanding Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.《理解成本效益分析实用指南》
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Dec;9(12):4200-4207. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 9.