Park Jenna A, Gottlieb Daniel J, Watts Bradley V, Dufort Vincent, Gradus Jamie L, Shiner Brian
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont (Park, Gottlieb, Watts, Dufort, Shiner); Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire (Park, Shiner); Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington (Watts); School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston (Gradus).
Am J Psychother. 2025 Jun 15;78(2):96-102. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20240035. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
This study aimed to compare suicide mortality rates for patients receiving two evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) protocols for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): cognitive processing therapy (CPT) and prolonged exposure (PE).
Suicide mortality was measured among U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs patients with PTSD who received EBP from 2009 through 2019. Regional variation in delivering CPT versus PE was leveraged as an instrumental variable (IV) to compare suicide mortality by using standard adjustment and IV-based analyses.
In total, 62,686 patients received EBP for PTSD; 82.4% were male, and the mean±SD age was 46.9±14.4. Patients were followed for a median of 6 years, and there were 136 deaths by suicide (38.3 and 32.4 per 100,000 person-years among the CPT and PE groups, respectively). The regional rate of CPT versus PE delivery was a strong IV that had greater explanatory power for the type of EBP received than all patient factors combined. The standard adjustment model for CPT produced a hazard ratio of 1.25, whereas the reduced-form IV produced a hazard ratio of 1.22. The probit IV, in which relevant covariates were updated annually, produced an odds ratio of 0.99. The time-to-event IV produced a hazard ratio of 1.20. The differences were not significant.
No statistically significant difference was found between CPT and PE in the outcome of death by suicide. More effective interventions that result in higher remission rates would likely need to be developed to achieve a relative decrease in suicide risk through PTSD treatment.
本研究旨在比较接受两种循证心理治疗方案治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的患者的自杀死亡率:认知加工疗法(CPT)和延长暴露疗法(PE)。
对2009年至2019年期间接受循证心理治疗的美国退伍军人事务部PTSD患者的自杀死亡率进行测量。利用CPT与PE治疗的地区差异作为工具变量(IV),通过标准调整和基于IV的分析来比较自杀死亡率。
共有62686例患者接受了PTSD的循证心理治疗;82.4%为男性,平均年龄±标准差为46.9±14.4岁。患者的随访时间中位数为6年,共有136例自杀死亡(CPT组和PE组分别为每10万人年38.3例和32.4例)。CPT与PE治疗的地区使用率是一个强有力的工具变量,对于所接受的循证心理治疗类型的解释力大于所有患者因素的总和。CPT的标准调整模型产生的风险比为1.25,而简约形式的工具变量产生的风险比为1.22。每年更新相关协变量的概率单位工具变量产生的优势比为0.99。事件发生时间工具变量产生的风险比为1.20。差异无统计学意义。
CPT和PE在自杀死亡结局方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。可能需要开发更有效的干预措施以提高缓解率,从而通过PTSD治疗实现自杀风险的相对降低。