Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物使用障碍的丁丙诺啡与美沙酮治疗死亡率比较。

A comparison of mortality rates for buprenorphine versus methadone treatments for opioid use disorder.

机构信息

Mental Health and Behavioral Science Service, White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.

Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2023 Jan;147(1):6-15. doi: 10.1111/acps.13477. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mortality from opioid use disorder (OUD) can be reduced for patients who receive opioid agonist treatment (OAT). In the United States (US), OATs have different requirements including nearly daily visits to a dispensing facility for methadone but weekly to monthly prescriptions for buprenorphine. Our objective was to compare mortality rates for buprenorphine and methadone treatments among a large sample of US patients with OUD.

METHODS

We measured all-cause mortality, overdose mortality, and suicide mortality among US Department of Veterans Affairs patients with a diagnosis of OUD who received OAT from 2010 through 2019. We leveraged substantial and sustained regional variation in prescribing buprenorphine versus methadone as an instrumental variable (IV) and used inverse propensity of treatment weighting to balance relevant covariates across treatment groups. We compared mortality with true two-stage IV using both probit and linear probability models, as well as a reduced form IV model, adjusting for demographics and health status.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 61,997 patients with OUD who received OAT, of whom 92.7% were male with a mean age of 47.9 (SD = 14.1) years. Patients were followed for a median of 2 (IQR = 1,4) calendar years. Across regional terciles, mean methadone prescribing was 4.8%, 19.5%, and 75.1% of OAT patients. All models identified significant reductions in all-cause and suicide mortality for buprenorphine relative to methadone. For example, predicted all-cause mortality from the probit model was 169.7 per 10,000 person years (95% CI, 157.8, 179.6) in the lowest tercile of methadone prescribing compared with 206.1 (95% CI, 196.0, 216.3) in the highest tercile. No difference was identified for overdose mortality.

CONCLUSION

We found significantly lower all-cause mortality and suicide mortality rates for buprenorphine compared with methadone. Our results support the less restrictive prescribing practices for buprenorphine as OAT in the US.

摘要

目的

接受阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)的患者,其阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)死亡率可降低。在美国(US),OAT 有不同的要求,包括美沙酮需要几乎每天到配药机构就诊,而丁丙诺啡只需每周到每月开具处方。我们的目的是比较大量美国 OUD 患者中丁丙诺啡和美沙酮治疗的死亡率。

方法

我们测量了 2010 年至 2019 年间,在有 OUD 诊断的美国退伍军人事务部患者中,所有原因死亡率、过量死亡率和自杀死亡率,这些患者接受了 OAT。我们利用处方丁丙诺啡与美沙酮的大量持续区域差异作为工具变量(IV),并使用治疗倾向逆概率加权来平衡治疗组之间的相关协变量。我们使用概率和线性概率模型以及简化的 IV 模型,通过真正的两阶段 IV 比较死亡率,调整人口统计学和健康状况。

结果

我们的队列包括 61997 名接受 OAT 的 OUD 患者,其中 92.7%为男性,平均年龄为 47.9(SD=14.1)岁。患者的中位随访时间为 2(IQR=1,4)个日历年。在区域三分位数中,美沙酮的平均处方率为 OAT 患者的 4.8%、19.5%和 75.1%。所有模型均发现丁丙诺啡相对于美沙酮在全因和自杀死亡率方面显著降低。例如,从概率模型预测的最低美沙酮处方三分位数的全因死亡率为每 10000 人年 169.7(95%CI,157.8,179.6),而最高三分位数的死亡率为 206.1(95%CI,196.0,216.3)。对于过量死亡率没有差异。

结论

我们发现丁丙诺啡的全因死亡率和自杀死亡率明显低于美沙酮。我们的结果支持美国 OAT 中对丁丙诺啡更宽松的处方实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验