HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1514, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):813-34. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9410-7. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
Development and targeting efforts by academic organizations to effectively promote research integrity can be enhanced if they are able to collect reliable data to benchmark baseline conditions, to assess areas needing improvement, and to subsequently assess the impact of specific initiatives. To date, no standardized and validated tool has existed to serve this need. A web- and mail-based survey was administered in the second half of 2009 to 2,837 randomly selected biomedical and social science faculty and postdoctoral fellows at 40 academic health centers in top-tier research universities in the United States. Measures included the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) as well as measures of perceptions of organizational justice. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded seven subscales of organizational research climate, all of which demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α ranging from 0.81 to 0.87) and adequate test-retest reliability (Pearson r ranging from 0.72 to 0.83). A broad range of correlations between the seven subscales and five measures of organizational justice (unadjusted regression coefficients ranging from 0.13 to 0.95) document both construct and discriminant validity of the instrument. The SORC demonstrates good internal (alpha) and external reliability (test-retest) as well as both construct and discriminant validity.
如果学术组织能够收集可靠的数据来基准化基线情况、评估需要改进的领域,并随后评估特定举措的影响,那么他们就能更好地制定和实施旨在有效促进研究诚信的发展和目标。迄今为止,还没有标准化和经过验证的工具来满足这一需求。2009 年下半年,在美国顶尖研究型大学的 40 所学术健康中心,对随机抽取的 2837 名生物医学和社会科学教师和博士后进行了基于网络和邮件的调查。测量工具包括组织研究氛围调查(SORC)以及对组织公平感的测量。探索性和验证性因子分析得出了组织研究氛围的七个分量表,所有分量表的内部一致性(Cronbach's α 值在 0.81 到 0.87 之间)和测试-重测信度(Pearson r 值在 0.72 到 0.83 之间)都令人满意。七个分量表与组织公平的五个测量指标之间的广泛相关性(未经调整的回归系数在 0.13 到 0.95 之间)记录了该工具的结构和判别效度。SORC 具有良好的内部(α)和外部可靠性(测试-重测)以及结构和判别效度。