Suppr超能文献

组织研究氛围调查(SORC)的编制与验证。

Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC).

机构信息

HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1514, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):813-34. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9410-7. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

Abstract

Development and targeting efforts by academic organizations to effectively promote research integrity can be enhanced if they are able to collect reliable data to benchmark baseline conditions, to assess areas needing improvement, and to subsequently assess the impact of specific initiatives. To date, no standardized and validated tool has existed to serve this need. A web- and mail-based survey was administered in the second half of 2009 to 2,837 randomly selected biomedical and social science faculty and postdoctoral fellows at 40 academic health centers in top-tier research universities in the United States. Measures included the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) as well as measures of perceptions of organizational justice. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded seven subscales of organizational research climate, all of which demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α ranging from 0.81 to 0.87) and adequate test-retest reliability (Pearson r ranging from 0.72 to 0.83). A broad range of correlations between the seven subscales and five measures of organizational justice (unadjusted regression coefficients ranging from 0.13 to 0.95) document both construct and discriminant validity of the instrument. The SORC demonstrates good internal (alpha) and external reliability (test-retest) as well as both construct and discriminant validity.

摘要

如果学术组织能够收集可靠的数据来基准化基线情况、评估需要改进的领域,并随后评估特定举措的影响,那么他们就能更好地制定和实施旨在有效促进研究诚信的发展和目标。迄今为止,还没有标准化和经过验证的工具来满足这一需求。2009 年下半年,在美国顶尖研究型大学的 40 所学术健康中心,对随机抽取的 2837 名生物医学和社会科学教师和博士后进行了基于网络和邮件的调查。测量工具包括组织研究氛围调查(SORC)以及对组织公平感的测量。探索性和验证性因子分析得出了组织研究氛围的七个分量表,所有分量表的内部一致性(Cronbach's α 值在 0.81 到 0.87 之间)和测试-重测信度(Pearson r 值在 0.72 到 0.83 之间)都令人满意。七个分量表与组织公平的五个测量指标之间的广泛相关性(未经调整的回归系数在 0.13 到 0.95 之间)记录了该工具的结构和判别效度。SORC 具有良好的内部(α)和外部可靠性(测试-重测)以及结构和判别效度。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC).
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):813-34. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9410-7. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
2
Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):835-50. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9409-0. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
3
The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):67-83. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.67.
5
Survey of organizational research climates in three research intensive, doctoral granting universities.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):72-88. doi: 10.1177/1556264614552798. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
7
Perceptions of organizational culture and organizational citizenship by faculty in U.S. colleges and schools of pharmacy.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Apr;10(4):403-412. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.017. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
9
Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university.
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):876-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909.
10
Hospital nurses' perceptions of the ethical climate of their work setting.
Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(4):345-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01331.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing the usefulness of a quality system in preclinical research.
Neurosci Appl. 2024 Nov 13;4:105395. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.105395. eCollection 2025.
2
Climate of Accountability, Respect, and Ethics Survey (CARES): development and validation of an organizational climate survey.
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Feb 25;10:1516726. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1516726. eCollection 2025.
3
Description and Impact of the 20-Year Fogarty International Center/NIH Middle East Research Ethics Training Initiative.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2025 Mar 2:15562646251316711. doi: 10.1177/15562646251316711.
5
Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading.
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec 4;38(47):e405. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e405.
7
For the "good of the lab": Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group.
Account Res. 2023 May;30(4):199-218. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1983799. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
Science as collaborative knowledge generation.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;60(1):1-28. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12430. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
Assessing the climate for research ethics in labs: Development and validation of a brief measure.
Account Res. 2022 Jan;29(1):2-17. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1881891. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental Factors Contributing to Wrongdoing in Medicine: A Criterion-Based Review of Studies and Cases.
Ethics Behav. 2012 May 9;22(3):163-188. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2011.641832. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
2
Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):835-50. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9409-0. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
3
The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Sep;5(3):67-83. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.67.
4
Beyond "compliance": the role of institutional culture in promoting research integrity.
Acad Med. 2010 Aug;85(8):1296-302. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e5f0e5.
6
Content Validation of the Organizational Climate for Research Integrity (OCRI) Survey.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Dec;2(4):35-52. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.35.
7
Personality and ethical decision-making in research: the role of perceptions of self and others.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Dec;2(4):15-34. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.15.
8
Research funding. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research.
Science. 2008 Aug 1;321(5889):644-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1160272.
9
Repairing research integrity.
Nature. 2008 Jun 19;453(7198):980-2. doi: 10.1038/453980a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验