Mediouni Sarah, Ndione Claire, Parmley E Jane, Poder Thomas G, Carabin Hélène, Aenishaenslin Cécile
Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Canada.
Groupe de Recherche en Épidémiologie des Zoonoses et Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Canada.
One Health. 2025 Feb 14;20:100995. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.100995. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Developing and implementing effective surveillance programs for infectious diseases (ID) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires the integration of information across relevant disciplines and sectors. Yet, establishing and sustaining collaboration at each step of the surveillance process, and modalities to translate integrated surveillance results into actions, are not well understood. This systematic review was designed to map and explore peer-reviewed tools that were either designed or used for evaluation of integrated surveillance systems for ID or AMR, and to identify the limitations of these tools and remaining methodological or knowledge gaps. A systematic search was conducted using keywords related to: "Evaluation", "Surveillance" and "One Health" in four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CAB abstract) up to the 28th of October 2022. Articles were selected if they presented an evaluation tool for integrated surveillance systems for ID or AMR (methodological study) or an application of such a tool (case study). All selected articles went through a quality check using the MetaQAT tool. Of 25 articles retrieved, 13 presented a methodological study, while 12 described a case study. Three main types of evaluation were identified through 17 tools: theoretical, process and impact evaluations. Both methodological and case study papers predominantly considered organizational and operational aspects in their evaluation. Although costs and/or impacts were discussed in some case studies, only one article reported an economic impact analysis. Evaluation of One Health integration and multisectoral collaboration was included in four methodological and four case study articles. One major challenge identified in this systematic review is the lack of clear guidance and standardized criteria for the comprehensive evaluation of complex integrated surveillance systems. To overcome this, it is essential to develop, validate, and apply methodologies adapted to these evaluation needs.
制定和实施有效的传染病(ID)及抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)监测计划需要整合相关学科和部门的信息。然而,在监测过程的每个步骤建立并维持合作,以及将综合监测结果转化为行动的方式,目前还没有得到很好的理解。本系统综述旨在梳理和探索经同行评审的、设计用于或已用于评估ID或AMR综合监测系统的工具,并识别这些工具的局限性以及尚存的方法学或知识空白。截至2022年10月28日,我们在四个数据库(Medline、Embase、Web of Science和CAB文摘库)中使用与“评估”“监测”和“同一健康”相关的关键词进行了系统检索。如果文章介绍了用于ID或AMR综合监测系统的评估工具(方法学研究)或此类工具的应用(案例研究),则将其纳入。所有入选文章都使用MetaQAT工具进行了质量检查。在检索到的25篇文章中,13篇为方法学研究,12篇描述了案例研究。通过17种工具确定了三种主要类型的评估:理论评估、过程评估和影响评估。方法学论文和案例研究论文在评估中主要考虑组织和运营方面。虽然在一些案例研究中讨论了成本和/或影响,但只有一篇文章报告了经济影响分析。四篇方法学文章和四篇案例研究文章纳入了对“同一健康”整合和多部门合作的评估。本系统综述中确定的一个主要挑战是,缺乏对复杂综合监测系统进行全面评估的明确指导和标准化标准。为克服这一问题,开发、验证和应用适用于这些评估需求的方法至关重要。