Wolf Jürgen, Goring Sarah, Lee Adam, Cho Byoung Chul, Drilon Alexander, Yuan Yong, Ayers Dieter, Lozano-Ortega Greta, Korol Ellen E, Korpach Sarah G, Crabtree Madeleine, Huria Lavanya, Calvet Christophe Y, Camidge D Ross
Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
Broadstreet HEOR, Vancouver, BC V5Y 1L8, Canada.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 22;17(5):748. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050748.
Head-to-head evidence comparing repotrectinib against other approved ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is not currently available. The objective of this study was to indirectly compare progression-free survival (PFS), the objective response rate (ORR), and the duration of response (DoR) for repotrectinib vs. crizotinib and vs. entrectinib in patients with TKI-naïve locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC).
Using evidence from a systematic literature review, unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were used to estimate population-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and DoR and odds ratios (ORs) for ORR for repotrectinib vs. crizotinib and vs. entrectinib among patients with TKI-naïve aNSCLC. The MAICs were adjusted for imbalances in baseline patient characteristics that were pre-specified as being prognostic or predictive of treatment effects. Weighted Cox (for PFS and DoR) and logistic (for ORR) regression models were fit. Supplementary analyses (SAs) explored the impact of missing data and modeling assumptions on effect estimates.
The evidence base was formed by TRIDENT-1 EXP-1 (repotrectinib; N = 71), a pooled set of five trials involving crizotinib (N = 273), and the pooled ALKA-372-001/STARTRK-1 and -2 trials (entrectinib; N = 168). After population adjustment, repotrectinib was associated with statistically significant improvements in PFS relative to crizotinib (HR = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29, 0.67) and entrectinib (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.91). Differences in ORR and DoR were not statistically significant but numerically favored repotrectinib. SAs were consistent with the main analyses across all comparisons.
The analysis demonstrated the strong benefits of repotrectinib in PFS, which was robust across different SAs and supported by numerically favorable results for DoR (where available) and ORR. These results, alongside the published TRIDENT-1 clinical data, further support repotrectinib as a potential new standard of care for TKI-naïve patients with aNSCLC.
目前尚无头对头比较瑞波替尼与其他已批准的ROS1酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的证据。本研究的目的是间接比较初治的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)患者中,瑞波替尼与克唑替尼以及与恩曲替尼的无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和缓解持续时间(DoR)。
利用系统文献综述的证据,采用非锚定匹配调整间接比较(MAICs)来估计初治aNSCLC患者中,瑞波替尼与克唑替尼以及与恩曲替尼的PFS的人群调整风险比(HRs)、DoR的HRs和ORR的优势比(ORs)。MAICs针对预先指定为预后或预测治疗效果的基线患者特征的不平衡进行了调整。拟合了加权Cox(用于PFS和DoR)和逻辑(用于ORR)回归模型。补充分析(SAs)探讨了缺失数据和建模假设对效应估计的影响。
证据基础由TRIDENT-1 EXP-1(瑞波替尼;N = 71)、一组涉及克唑替尼的五项试验的汇总集(N = 273)以及汇总的ALKA-372-001/STARTRK-1和-2试验(恩曲替尼;N = 168)构成。经过人群调整后,与克唑替尼(HR = 0.44;95%置信区间[CI]:0.29,0.67)和恩曲替尼(HR = 0.57;95% CI:0.36,0.91)相比,瑞波替尼与PFS的统计学显著改善相关。ORR和DoR的差异无统计学意义,但数值上有利于瑞波替尼。SAs在所有比较中与主要分析一致。
分析证明了瑞波替尼在PFS方面的显著益处,这在不同的SAs中都很稳健,并得到了DoR(如有)和ORR数值上有利结果的支持。这些结果与已发表的TRIDENT-1临床数据一起,进一步支持瑞波替尼作为初治aNSCLC患者潜在的新护理标准。