Suppr超能文献

健康与不健康的植物性餐厅餐食

Healthful vs. Unhealthful Plant-Based Restaurant Meals.

作者信息

Williams Kim A, Horton Amy M, Baldridge Rosella D, Ikram Mashaal

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, 550 South Jackson Street, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

Office of Community Engagement, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2025 Feb 20;17(5):742. doi: 10.3390/nu17050742.

Abstract

Vegan/vegetarian (VEG) restaurants and VEG options in omnivore (OMNI) restaurants may serve unhealthful plant-based food that may be more harmful than a typical American diet. A sample of 561 restaurants with online menus were analyzed over a 3-year period. Each plant-based menu entrée was counted, up to a maximum of ten entrées per restaurant, meaning that a restaurant customer could select from ten or more healthful plant-based choices. Entrées containing refined grains (e.g., white rice and refined flour), saturated fat (e.g., palm oil and coconut oil), or deep-fried foods were counted as zero. We evaluated 278 VEG and 283 OMNI restaurants. A full menu (10 or more plant-based entrées) was available in 59% of the VEG, but only 16% of the OMNI ( < 0.0001). Zero healthful options occurred in 27% of OMNI, but only 14% of VEG ( = 0.0002). The mean healthy entrée count for all restaurants was 3.2, meaning that, on average, there were only about three healthful plant-based choices of entrées on the menu, significantly more in VEG (4.0 vs. 2.4 < 0.0001). The most common entrée reduction was for refined grains (e.g., white flour in veggie-burger buns or white rice in Asian entrées, n = 1408), followed by fried items (n = 768) and saturated fat (n = 318). VEG restaurants had a significantly higher frequency of adequate VEG options (≥7 options, 24% vs. 13%, = 0.0005). Restaurants listed as VEG have a slightly higher number of healthful entrées than OMNI restaurants, which offer more limited vegan/vegetarian options. Given the published relationship between unhealthful dietary patterns, chronic illness, and mortality, we propose that detailed nutrition facts be publicly available for every restaurant.

摘要

纯素食/素食(VEG)餐厅以及杂食(OMNI)餐厅中的素食选项可能提供不健康的植物性食物,这些食物可能比典型的美国饮食更有害。在三年时间里,对561家有在线菜单的餐厅进行了分析。统计了每份植物性菜单主菜的数量,每家餐厅最多统计十道主菜,这意味着餐厅顾客可以从十种或更多健康的植物性菜品中进行选择。含有精制谷物(如白米和精制面粉)、饱和脂肪(如棕榈油和椰子油)或油炸食品的主菜计为零。我们评估了278家纯素食餐厅和283家杂食餐厅。59%的纯素食餐厅提供完整菜单(10道或更多植物性主菜),但杂食餐厅中只有16%提供完整菜单(P<0.0001)。27%的杂食餐厅没有健康选项,而纯素食餐厅中这一比例仅为14%(P = 0.0002)。所有餐厅健康主菜的平均数量为3.2道,这意味着菜单上平均只有大约三道健康的植物性主菜可供选择,纯素食餐厅的数量显著更多(4.0道对2.4道,P<0.0001)。最常见的主菜减分项是精制谷物(如素食汉堡面包中的白面粉或亚洲主菜中的白米,n = 1408),其次是油炸食品(n = 768)和饱和脂肪(n = 318)。纯素食餐厅中充足的素食选项(≥7种选项)的出现频率显著更高(24%对13%,P = 0.0005)。被列为纯素食的餐厅比杂食餐厅有略多一些的健康主菜,杂食餐厅提供的纯素食/素食选项更为有限。鉴于已公布的不健康饮食模式、慢性病和死亡率之间的关系,我们建议每家餐厅都应公开详细的营养信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a44/11901562/cf3edaf27c29/nutrients-17-00742-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验