Ji Zejun, Nie Jianjun, Shen Qingli, Fu Zhonghua
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College, Nanyang, Henan, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, School of Clinical Medicine, Henan University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1556598. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1556598. eCollection 2025.
For women of childbearing age, the risks of uncontrolled epilepsy to the mother and fetus need to be balanced against the potential teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The combined use of different types of AEDs has become a potential treatment option for the effective control of epileptic symptoms, while different studies present significant difference between the combined use of AEDs and foetal toxicity, which need a large comprehensive study to clarify the relation.
The study aims to analyze data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to explore the impact of monotherapy or polytherapy of AEDs on foetal and infant disorders.
Bayesian analysis and non-proportional methods were employed to assess the association between AED use and foetal disorders based on the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023. The clinical characteristics and outcome of patients were also investigated.
The study identified significant correlation between foetal disorders and the first and second generation AEDs, with RORs of 3.8 and 4.9, respectively. Valproic acid monotherapy showed the highest correlation with foetal disorders (ROR = 15.8, PRR = 16.3, IC025 = 3.8) and was uniquely associated with male reproductive toxicity. The risk of foetal disorders associated with combination therapies varied depending on the specific AEDs combination, with some increasing and others decreasing the risk compared to monotherapy.
The analysis of the reports from FAERS database identified correlation between foetal disorders and AEDs and provided a comprehensive overview of the incidence and prognosis of different AEDs monotherapy and combination, which may provide some advice for the selection of drug for women of childbearing age.
对于育龄妇女,未得到控制的癫痫对母亲和胎儿的风险需要与抗癫痫药物(AEDs)潜在的致畸作用相权衡。联合使用不同类型的抗癫痫药物已成为有效控制癫痫症状的一种潜在治疗选择,然而不同研究显示抗癫痫药物联合使用与胎儿毒性之间存在显著差异,这需要一项大型综合研究来阐明两者关系。
本研究旨在分析美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据,以探讨抗癫痫药物单药治疗或联合治疗对胎儿和婴儿疾病的影响。
采用贝叶斯分析和非比例法,基于2004年第一季度至2023年第四季度的FAERS数据库评估抗癫痫药物使用与胎儿疾病之间的关联。还对患者的临床特征和结局进行了调查。
该研究确定胎儿疾病与第一代和第二代抗癫痫药物之间存在显著相关性,相对危险度分别为3.8和4.9。丙戊酸单药治疗与胎儿疾病的相关性最高(相对危险度=15.8,比例报告比=16.3,95%可信区间下限=3.8),且与男性生殖毒性有独特关联。与联合治疗相关的胎儿疾病风险因具体的抗癫痫药物组合而异,与单药治疗相比,一些组合增加了风险,而另一些则降低了风险。
对FAERS数据库报告的分析确定了胎儿疾病与抗癫痫药物之间的相关性,并全面概述了不同抗癫痫药物单药治疗和联合治疗的发病率及预后情况,这可能为育龄期妇女的药物选择提供一些建议。