Suppr超能文献

古吉拉特邦一家三级医疗中心对《2023年甲状腺细胞病理学报告贝塞斯达系统》(TBSRTC)与美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR-TIRADS)之间一致性的评估。

Evaluation of concordance between the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology 2023 (TBSRTC) and ACR-TIRADS at a tertiary care center in Gujarat.

作者信息

Biswas Sushrita, Shah Ina, Goswami Hansa, Chaudhuri Avik

机构信息

Department of Pathology, B. J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Department of Pharmacology, B. J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_165_24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent advancements in diagnostic techniques have resulted in a higher detection rate of thyroid cancers within existing thyroid nodules. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) 2023 and the American College of Radiology-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) are first-line investigations for thyroid nodules, aiding in diagnosis and management decisions.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the concordance between TBSRTC 2023 and ACR-TIRADS in reporting thyroid lesions and assess their accuracy in diagnosing malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, laboratory data-based study included patients presenting with thyroid nodules, who underwent ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), followed by thyroidectomy. Overall concordance between TBSRTC, ACR-TIRADS, and histopathologic diagnosis was evaluated, along with their diagnostic accuracy. Risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for both systems using the final HPE diagnosis.

RESULTS

115 patient records were analyzed. Interobserver agreement between TBSRTC and ACR-TIRADS was moderate (kappa = 0.493 ± 0.093 [±SE]). ROM across extremes of TBSRTC and TIRADS categories were found to be similar. Higher TBSRTC grades correlated with higher ACR-TIRADS grades (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.594, P = 4.5 × 10 -16). The accuracy of FNAC findings and TIRADS to predict malignancy was 84.35% versus 80.87%, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.644).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest a good concordance between both reporting systems for thyroid nodules, with moderate interrater agreement. Both systems are equally useful for surgical decision-making and avoiding unnecessary surgeries.

摘要

背景

诊断技术的最新进展使得在现有的甲状腺结节中甲状腺癌的检出率更高。2023年甲状腺细胞病理学报告贝塞斯达系统(TBSRTC)和美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR-TIRADS)是甲状腺结节的一线检查方法,有助于诊断和管理决策。

目的

评估2023年TBSRTC和ACR-TIRADS在报告甲状腺病变方面的一致性,并评估它们在诊断恶性肿瘤方面的准确性。

材料和方法

这项基于实验室数据的回顾性研究纳入了出现甲状腺结节的患者,这些患者接受了超声检查和细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC),随后进行了甲状腺切除术。评估了TBSRTC、ACR-TIRADS和组织病理学诊断之间的总体一致性及其诊断准确性。使用最终的组织病理学检查(HPE)诊断计算两个系统的恶性风险(ROM)。

结果

分析了115份患者记录。TBSRTC和ACR-TIRADS之间的观察者间一致性为中等(kappa = 0.493±0.093[±标准误])。发现TBSRTC和TIRADS类别两端的ROM相似。较高的TBSRTC分级与较高的ACR-TIRADS分级相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数 = 0.594,P = 4.5×10-16)。FNAC结果和TIRADS预测恶性肿瘤的准确性分别为84.35%和80.87%,无统计学显著差异(P = 0.644)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,两种甲状腺结节报告系统之间具有良好的一致性,观察者间一致性中等。这两种系统在手术决策和避免不必要的手术方面同样有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验