Harrison Anthony W, Christensen Bruce K, Whitford Thomas J
University of New South Wales.
The Tic Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Sep 1;37(9):1431-1448. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02321.
While volitional movement is thought to be initiated based on its anticipated capacity to achieve sensory goals, stimulus-driven movement may be generated with less regard for its specific effects. Sensorimotor processes that make use of action-effect predictions may therefore differ between these forms of movement, including sensory attenuation and the detection of mispredicted motor effects. In this study, we explored sensory attenuation by comparing the evoked response of externally-generated tones with those produced by participants (n = 61), both according to their own timing (i.e., volitionally) and in response to simple visual cues (i.e., stimulus-driven). The influence of stimulus identity prediction (i.e., the predictability of tone frequency) on N1 amplitudes was not found to differ between self- and externally-generated stimuli, or on the basis of volitional control. Reduced P2 amplitudes were observed in response to self-generated tones, which may suggest that these were subject to higher levels of attentional control, including processes involved in the termination of attention. To explore misprediction sensitivity, we compared the influence of stimulus identity prediction on N2b component amplitudes. A significant interaction was found to reflect heightened sensitivity to mispredicted outcomes of volitional action, compared with those of stimulus-driven movement. In light of recent evidence that attentional suppression may attenuate the primary cortical response to outcomes of stimulus-driven movement, we propose that this mechanism might also serve to diminish misprediction sensitivity. As such, these effects may represent important features of sensorimotor processing that assist in differentiating stimuli on the basis of self-generation and intentionality.
虽然人们认为意志性运动是基于其预期实现感觉目标的能力而发起的,但刺激驱动的运动可能在产生时较少考虑其具体效果。因此,利用动作-效果预测的感觉运动过程在这些运动形式之间可能会有所不同,包括感觉衰减和对错误预测的运动效果的检测。在本研究中,我们通过比较外部产生的音调与参与者(n = 61)产生的音调的诱发反应来探索感觉衰减,这两种情况分别是根据他们自己的时间(即意志性地)以及对简单视觉线索的反应(即刺激驱动)。未发现刺激身份预测(即音调频率的可预测性)对N1振幅的影响在自我产生和外部产生的刺激之间存在差异,也未基于意志控制而有所不同。在对自我产生的音调的反应中观察到P2振幅降低,这可能表明这些音调受到更高水平的注意力控制,包括与注意力终止相关的过程。为了探索错误预测敏感性,我们比较了刺激身份预测对N2b成分振幅的影响。发现了一个显著的交互作用,反映出与刺激驱动的运动相比,对意志性动作的错误预测结果具有更高的敏感性。鉴于最近的证据表明注意力抑制可能会减弱对刺激驱动运动结果的初级皮层反应,我们提出这种机制也可能有助于降低错误预测敏感性。因此,这些效应可能代表了感觉运动处理的重要特征,有助于根据自我产生和意向性来区分刺激。