• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌胸腹段食管切除术的方法:网络荟萃分析——研究方案

Approaches for thoracoabdominal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis - study protocol.

作者信息

Rebelo Artur, Friedrichs Juliane, Grilli Maurizio, Vey Johannes, Klose Johannes, Merling Marie, Kleeff Joerg, Ronellenfitsch Ulrich

机构信息

Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Martin Luther University of Halle Wittenberg Faculty of Medicine, Halle (Saale), Germany

Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Martin Luther University of Halle Wittenberg Faculty of Medicine, Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):e093561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093561.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093561
PMID:40082002
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11907055/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal cancer is the seventh most frequently diagnosed cancer and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Oesophagectomy remains the main curative treatment option. The effect of different surgical approaches (completely open, hybrid, completely minimally invasive and robot-assisted) on patients undergoing thoracoabdominal oesophagectomy (Ivor-Lewis's procedure) for oesophageal cancer is evaluated, focusing on overall survival, postoperative mortality and morbidity.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic literature search will be conducted in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform using predefined search terms. A random-effects (network) meta-analysis using the frequentist framework will be performed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As this study is based on previously published data, no ethical approval is required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations to inform clinical decision-makers (eg, surgeons, gastroenterologists).

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024564915.

摘要

引言

食管癌是全球第七大最常被诊断出的癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的第六大主要原因。食管切除术仍然是主要的根治性治疗选择。本研究评估了不同手术方式(完全开放、杂交、完全微创和机器人辅助)对接受胸腹段食管癌食管切除术(艾弗·刘易斯手术)患者的影响,重点关注总生存期、术后死亡率和发病率。

方法与分析

将使用预定义的检索词在PubMed/Medline、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、ClinicalTrials.gov和国际临床试验注册平台上进行系统的文献检索。将采用频率学派框架进行随机效应(网络)荟萃分析。

伦理与传播

由于本研究基于先前发表的数据,无需伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物和会议报告进行传播,以为临床决策者(如外科医生、胃肠病学家)提供参考。

试验注册号

CRD42024564915。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069a/11907055/4641a5e2b8e2/bmjopen-15-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069a/11907055/4641a5e2b8e2/bmjopen-15-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/069a/11907055/4641a5e2b8e2/bmjopen-15-3-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Approaches for thoracoabdominal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis - study protocol.食管癌胸腹段食管切除术的方法:网络荟萃分析——研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):e093561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093561.
2
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.腹腔镜与开放经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011390. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011390.pub2.
3
Minimally invasive techniques for transthoracic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.经胸食管癌微创切除术治疗食管癌的微创技术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):787-803. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50330. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
Non-surgical versus surgical treatment for oesophageal cancer.食管癌的非手术治疗与手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 29;3(3):CD011498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011498.pub2.
5
Immunomodulatory therapies in community-acquired pneumonia: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.社区获得性肺炎的免疫调节治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 10;15(7):e098994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-098994.
6
Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - study protocol.穿孔性消化性溃疡治疗方法的研究:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析 - 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 18;14(3):e082732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082732.
7
Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy.食管切除术后食管胃吻合术的网膜成形术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 2;2014(10):CD008446. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008446.pub3.
8
EstablishINg the best STEp-up treatments for children with uncontrolled asthma despite INhaled corticosteroids (EINSTEIN): protocol for a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis using individual participant data (IPD).为尽管使用吸入性糖皮质激素但哮喘仍未得到控制的儿童确定最佳升级治疗方案(爱因斯坦研究):一项使用个体参与者数据(IPD)的系统评价、网状Meta分析和成本效益分析方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e040528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040528.
9
Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on perioperative neurocognitive dysfunction: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.经颅磁刺激对围手术期神经认知功能障碍的影响:一项关于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e102865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102865.
10
Comparative effects of behaviour change techniques using eHealth and mHealth in promoting dietary behaviour: protocol for a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.比较基于电子健康和移动健康的行为改变技术在促进饮食行为方面的效果:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):e084774. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084774.

本文引用的文献

1
Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on esophagectomies in esophageal cancer: The superiority of minimally invasive surgery.网状荟萃分析食管癌根治术中随机对照试验:微创手术的优越性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 14;28(30):4201-4210. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4201.
2
Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus video-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.机器人辅助与视频辅助 McKeown 食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1501-1510. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01343-0. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
3
Open versus hybrid versus totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
经胸入路与胸腹联合入路与完全微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec;164(6):e233-e254. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.051. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
4
Surgical outcomes after totally minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.完全微创Ivor Lewis食管切除术后的手术结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;48(3):473-481. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.119. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
5
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.机器人辅助、视频辅助与开放性食管癌切除术临床疗效的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2129228. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29228.
6
Effectiveness of Transthoracic Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Meta-Analysis.胸腔镜辅助微创食管切除术的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
J Invest Surg. 2021 Sep;34(9):963-973. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1725189. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
7
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
8
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
The comparison of thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open esophagectomy: A meta-analysis.胸腔镜-腹腔镜联合食管癌切除术与开放食管癌切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Indian J Cancer. 2017 Jan-Mar;54(1):115-119. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_192_17.
10
Oesophageal cancer.食管癌。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Jul 27;3:17048. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.48.