Zhang Nan-Rong, Zhang Li-Zhen, Chen Yi, Zhang Song, Li Shan, Gu Xiao-Ke, Li Jing, Li Hong
Department of Anaesthesia, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Biomedical Innovation Centre, Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 13;15(3):e093360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093360.
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are frequent after abdominal surgery and significantly affect postoperative outcomes. Intraoperative protective ventilation (IPV) has been demonstrated to mitigate PPCs. However, the comparative effectiveness of two common IPV regimens-IPV with or without periodic lung recruitment manoeuvres (PLRM)-in preventing PPCs is unclear. This study aims to compare the effects of these two IPV regimens on PPCs.
This study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial. A total of 1060 patients at intermediate or high risk for PPCs, scheduled to undergo major abdominal surgery, will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either an IPV with PLRM (intensive IPV group) or an IPV without PLRM (moderate IPV group). Patients assigned to the intensive IPV group will receive positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 6-10 cm HO with lung recruitment manoeuvres performed every 30 min. Patients in the moderate IPV group will receive the same level of PEEP without lung recruitment manoeuvres. Both groups will receive a tidal volume of 7 mL/kg predicted body weight and an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.3-0.4. The primary outcome is respiratory failure within the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes include other PPCs, extrapulmonary complications, unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit, length of postoperative hospital stay and mortality from any cause.
This protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. The first participant was recruited on 9 October 2022, with an estimated completion date of 30 May 2025. The results of this trial are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals.
NCT05556174.
腹部手术后肺部并发症(PPCs)很常见,且会显著影响术后结局。术中保护性通气(IPV)已被证明可减轻PPCs。然而,两种常见的IPV方案——有或没有定期肺复张手法(PLRM)的IPV——在预防PPCs方面的相对有效性尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较这两种IPV方案对PPCs的影响。
本研究是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。总共1060例有PPCs中高危风险、计划接受大型腹部手术的患者将被纳入研究,并随机分配接受有PLRM的IPV(强化IPV组)或没有PLRM的IPV(中度IPV组)。分配到强化IPV组的患者将接受6-10 cm H₂O的呼气末正压(PEEP),并每30分钟进行一次肺复张手法。中度IPV组的患者将接受相同水平的PEEP,但不进行肺复张手法。两组均接受7 mL/kg预计体重的潮气量和0.3-0.4的吸入氧分数。主要结局是术后第1个7天内的呼吸衰竭。次要结局包括其他PPCs、肺外并发症、重症监护病房的非计划入住、术后住院时间和任何原因导致的死亡率。
本方案已获得中国广州中山大学附属第六医院伦理委员会的批准。第一名参与者于2022年10月9日入组,预计完成日期为2025年5月30日。本试验的结果预计将发表在同行评审期刊上。
NCT05556174。