Nguyen Kevin H, Lim Kenneth, Gordon Sarah H, Cole Megan B
Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug;60(4):e14605. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14605. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
To examine five enrollee-reported experience of care metrics and assess enrollee, plan, and state characteristics associated with higher care ratings.
We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study using multivariable linear probability models and predictors that captured various enrollee, plan, and state characteristics. We evaluated five enrollee-reported experience of care measures: being "always or usually" easy to get needed care (yes/no), having a personal doctor (yes/no), having timely access to a checkup or routine care (yes/no), having timely access to specialty care (yes/no), and healthcare rating (0-10).
We used enrollee-level data for adults aged 18-64 from the National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) Adult Medicaid Managed Care Member Experience Survey in 2018 and 2020.
The study included 94,296 adults enrolled in 172 Medicaid managed care plans in 38 states and who responded to the member experience survey. Enrollees from racially and ethnically minoritized groups reported significantly worse experiences of care than non-Hispanic White enrollees on all outcomes. Larger plan size was associated with a lower likelihood of timely access to checkups (-5.44 percentage points [PP] difference) but a higher likelihood of having a personal doctor (4.52 PP). Plan for-profit status was associated with a lower likelihood of having access to needed care (-2.24 PP) or having a personal doctor (-4.07 PP). Enrollees in states with Medicaid managed care quality incentives for improving consumer experience of care were significantly more likely to report timely access to specialty care (5.16 PP).
Enrollees from racially and ethnically minoritized groups with poor health status report worse access to care, with characteristics such as for-profit plan status and large plan size being associated with access to care. Strategies to improve care experiences may include targeted outreach, equity initiatives, and strengthening provider networks and availability.
研究五项参保人报告的护理体验指标,并评估与更高护理评级相关的参保人、计划和州的特征。
我们使用多变量线性概率模型和预测变量进行了一项重复横断面研究,这些预测变量涵盖了各种参保人、计划和州的特征。我们评估了五项参保人报告的护理措施:获得所需护理“总是或通常”是否容易(是/否)、是否有私人医生(是/否)、是否能及时进行体检或常规护理(是/否)、是否能及时获得专科护理(是/否)以及医疗保健评级(0 - 10)。
我们使用了来自国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)2018年和2020年成人医疗补助管理式护理成员体验调查的18 - 64岁成年人的参保人层面数据。
该研究纳入了38个州172个医疗补助管理式护理计划中的94296名成年人,他们对成员体验调查做出了回应。在所有结果方面,来自少数族裔群体的参保人报告的护理体验明显比非西班牙裔白人参保人更差。计划规模较大与及时进行体检的可能性较低(相差 - 5.44个百分点[PP])但有私人医生的可能性较高(4.52个PP)相关。计划的营利性质与获得所需护理的可能性较低( - 2.24个PP)或有私人医生的可能性较低( - 4.07个PP)相关。在有医疗补助管理式护理质量激励措施以改善消费者护理体验的州,参保人报告能及时获得专科护理的可能性显著更高(5.16个PP)。
健康状况较差的少数族裔群体参保人获得护理的机会较差,营利性计划状态和计划规模较大等特征与获得护理的机会相关。改善护理体验的策略可能包括有针对性的外展服务、公平倡议以及加强提供者网络和可及性。