Perez Felipe P, Walker Brett, Morisaki Jorge, Kanakri Haitham, Rizkalla Maher
Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Explor Neurosci. 2025;4. doi: 10.37349/en.2025.100674. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
The use of neurostimulation devices for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing field. In this review, we examine the mechanism of action and therapeutic indications of these neurostimulation devices in the AD process. Rapid advancements in neurostimulation technologies are providing non-pharmacological relief to patients affected by AD pathology. Neurostimulation therapies include electrical stimulation that targets the circuitry-level connection in important brain areas such as the hippocampus to induce therapeutic neuromodulation of dysfunctional neural circuitry and electromagnetic field (EMF) stimulation that targets anti-amyloid molecular pathways to promote the degradation of beta-amyloid (Aβ). These devices target specific or diffuse cortical and subcortical brain areas to modulate neuronal activity at the electrophysiological or molecular pathway level, providing therapeutic effects for AD. This review attempts to determine the most effective and safe neurostimulation device for AD and provides an overview of potential and current clinical indications. Several EMF devices have shown a beneficial or harmful effect in cell cultures and animal models but not in AD human studies. These contradictory results may be related to the stimulation parameters of these devices, such as frequency, penetration depth, power deposition measured by specific absorption rate, time of exposure, type of cell, and tissue dielectric properties. Based on this, determining the optimal stimulation parameters for EMF devices in AD and understanding their mechanism of action is essential to promote their clinical application, our review suggests that repeated EMF stimulation (REMFS) is the most appropriate device for human AD treatments. Before its clinical application, it is necessary to consider the complicated and interconnected genetic and epigenetic effects of REMFS-biological system interaction. This will move forward the urgently needed therapy of EMF in human AD.
使用神经刺激设备治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一个不断发展的领域。在本综述中,我们研究了这些神经刺激设备在AD病程中的作用机制和治疗适应症。神经刺激技术的快速发展正在为受AD病理影响的患者提供非药物缓解。神经刺激疗法包括针对海马体等重要脑区的电路水平连接的电刺激,以诱导对功能失调的神经回路进行治疗性神经调节,以及针对抗淀粉样蛋白分子途径以促进β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)降解的电磁场(EMF)刺激。这些设备靶向特定或弥漫性的皮质和皮质下脑区,在电生理或分子途径水平调节神经元活动,为AD提供治疗效果。本综述试图确定用于AD的最有效和安全的神经刺激设备,并概述潜在和当前的临床适应症。一些EMF设备在细胞培养和动物模型中显示出有益或有害的效果,但在AD人体研究中却没有。这些相互矛盾的结果可能与这些设备的刺激参数有关,如频率、穿透深度、以比吸收率测量的功率沉积、暴露时间、细胞类型和组织介电特性。基于此,确定AD中EMF设备的最佳刺激参数并了解其作用机制对于促进其临床应用至关重要,我们的综述表明,重复电磁场刺激(REMFS)是治疗人类AD最合适的设备。在其临床应用之前,有必要考虑REMFS与生物系统相互作用的复杂且相互关联的遗传和表观遗传效应。这将推动EMF在人类AD中急需的治疗进展。