• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种通过RoboMarker进行的用于复曲面人工晶状体对准的节省成本的图像辅助方法与手动自水平标记法的对比

A cost-saving, picture-assisted method for toric intraocular lens alignment versus manual self-leveling marking via RoboMarker.

作者信息

Kiessling David, Roessler Gernot F, Widder Randolf A

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, St. Martinus-Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Gladbacher Str. 26, 40219, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Department of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 14;45(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03479-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-025-03479-5
PMID:40085282
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of two axis-marking methods for toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, one picture-assisted approach based on scleral vessel vectors, and the other based on a self-leveling device for manual marking.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study involved 60 eyes of 51 participants, who underwent phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation. In all eyes, preoperative markings were made in a seated position both manually via a self-leveling corneal marker (RoboMarker), and digitally on slit-lamp photographs, defining scleral vessels as landmarks, aiding to find the correct intraoperative orientation for an angular graduation instrument. The axis of IOL alignment at the end of surgery was determined from high resolution, intraoperative footage from a microscope-integrated camera and the axis-marking error served as an outcome measurement for both marking techniques. The endpoint was the alignment of the lens at the end of surgery.

RESULTS

The average axis-marking error was 2.5 ± 1.9 degrees for picture-assisted marking, which was significantly less than that of the self-leveling corneal marker, being 5.4 ± 4.4 degrees.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that scleral vessel vector marking leads to highly accurate toric IOL alignments, while being an inexpensive technique, as solely a slit-lamp camera is required for preoperative preparation.

摘要

目的

确定两种用于植入散光人工晶状体(IOL)的轴标记方法的准确性,一种是基于巩膜血管向量的图片辅助方法,另一种是基于手动标记的自水平装置。

方法

这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了51名参与者的60只眼睛,这些眼睛接受了散光IOL植入的超声乳化手术。在所有眼睛中,术前标记均在坐位时进行,一种是通过自水平角膜标记器(RoboMarker)手动标记,另一种是在裂隙灯照片上进行数字标记,将巩膜血管定义为地标,以帮助找到角度分度仪的正确术中方向。手术结束时IOL对准的轴由显微镜集成摄像头的高分辨率术中图像确定,轴标记误差作为两种标记技术的结果测量指标。终点是手术结束时晶状体的对准情况。

结果

图片辅助标记的平均轴标记误差为2.5±1.9度,明显小于自水平角膜标记器的误差,后者为5.4±4.4度。

结论

我们的结果表明,巩膜血管向量标记可实现高度准确的散光IOL对准,同时该技术成本低廉,因为术前准备仅需一台裂隙灯相机。

相似文献

1
A cost-saving, picture-assisted method for toric intraocular lens alignment versus manual self-leveling marking via RoboMarker.一种通过RoboMarker进行的用于复曲面人工晶状体对准的节省成本的图像辅助方法与手动自水平标记法的对比
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 14;45(1):98. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03479-5.
2
Digital versus slit-beam marking for toric intraocular lenses in cataract surgery.数字化与裂隙光束标记在白内障手术中的散光人工晶状体
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 27;22(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02548-y.
3
An easy and practical method for toric intraocular lens implantation: marking corneal astigmatic axis at slit-lamp.一种简单实用的散光人工晶状体植入方法:在裂隙灯下标记角膜散光轴。
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;37(1):179-184. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0250-3. Epub 2016 May 12.
4
Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation.威视数字化标记与智能手机辅助手动标记及单纯手动标记在散光型人工晶状体植入术中的比较。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;68(3):455-458. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_987_19.
5
Rotational slit-beam marking: an advanced manual corneal astigmatic marking method for toric intraocular lens implantation.旋转裂隙光束标记:一种用于有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入的先进手动角膜散光标记方法。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;40(11):3115-3125. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01498-y. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
6
Comparison of toric intraocular lens alignment between femtosecond laser-assisted capsular marking and digital marking.飞秒激光辅助囊袋标记与数字标记的 toric 人工晶状体定位比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024 Mar 1;50(3):230-235. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001344.
7
Toric lens implantation in cataract surgery: Automated versus manual horizontal axis marking, analysis of 50 cases.白内障手术中散光人工晶状体植入:自动与手动水平轴标记,50例分析
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2018 Jan;41(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.11.002. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
8
[Toric lens implantation in cataract surgery: Automatic versus manual horizontal axis marking, analysis of 50 cases].[白内障手术中散光人工晶状体植入:自动与手动水平轴标记,50例分析]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2018 Feb;41(2):136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.08.008. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
9
Randomized trial comparing visual outcomes of toric intraocular lens implantation using manual and digital marker.比较使用手动和数字标记的散光人工晶状体植入术视觉效果的随机试验。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):3020-3024. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_465_20.
10
Comparison of Toric Intraocular Lens Alignment Between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsular Marking and Manual Corneal Marking.飞秒激光辅助囊袋标记与手动角膜标记的 toric 人工晶状体定位比较。
J Refract Surg. 2020 Aug 1;36(8):536-542. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200602-01.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital vs manual axis marking for toric phakic intraocular lens alignment: prospective randomized intraindividual trial.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2025 Jan 1;51(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001553.
2
Evaluation of an intraoperative toric intraocular lens alignment system using an image-guided system.利用图像引导系统评估术中散光型人工晶状体定位系统。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Sep;45(9):1234-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
A Simple, Inexpensive, and Precise Photographic Method for Intraoperative Toric IOL Alignment.一种用于术中散光人工晶状体对准的简单、廉价且精确的摄影方法。
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2019 Apr;236(4):391-397. doi: 10.1055/a-0861-9601. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
4
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Marking Methods and the Novel toriCAM Application for Toric Intraocular Lens Alignment.两种标记方法及新型toriCAM应用于散光人工晶状体定位的准确性评估。
J Refract Surg. 2018 Mar 1;34(3):150-155. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180115-03.
5
Comparison of visual outcomes, alignment accuracy, and surgical time between 2 methods of corneal marking for toric intraocular lens implantation.两种角膜标记方法用于 toric 人工晶状体植入的视力结果、对准精度和手术时间的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Oct;43(10):1281-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
6
Image-guided system versus manual marking for toric intraocular lens alignment in cataract surgery.影像引导系统与手动标记在白内障手术中用于散光人工晶状体定位的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jun;43(6):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.03.041.
7
Accuracy of toric intraocular lens axis alignment using a 3-dimensional computer-guided visualization system.使用三维计算机引导可视化系统的 toric 人工晶状体轴定位准确性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Apr;42(4):550-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.12.052.
8
Intraoperative, real-time aberrometry during refractive cataract surgery with a sequentially shifting wavefront device.在采用连续移波前装置的屈光性白内障手术中进行术中实时像差测量。
J Refract Surg. 2013 Sep;29(9):630-5. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130819-04.
9
Toric intraocular lenses: historical overview, patient selection, IOL calculation, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and complications.toric 人工晶状体:历史概述、患者选择、IOL 计算、手术技术、临床结果和并发症。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Apr;39(4):624-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.02.020.
10
Evaluation of 4 corneal astigmatic marking methods.评估 4 种角膜散光标记方法。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;38(12):2094-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.039. Epub 2012 Oct 23.