Suppr超能文献

起搏模式在慢性心肌梗死犬模型中室性快速心律失常起始中的重要性。

Importance of the pacing mode in the initiation of ventricular tachyarrhythmia in a canine model of chronic myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Mitamura H, Ohm O J, Michelson E L, Sauermelch C, Dreifus L S

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Jul;6(1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80259-x.

Abstract

The use of unipolar anodal or bipolar pacing, as compared with unipolar cathodal pacing, purportedly increases the likelihood of inducing inadvertent ventricular fibrillation in susceptible patients. In this study, the ability to initiate sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation with unipolar cathodal, unipolar anodal and bipolar pacing modes was compared using programmed ventricular stimulation at 82 subendocardial periinfarction sites in 11 dogs with chronic myocardial infarction. The late diastolic excitability threshold was significantly higher and the ventricular refractory period was significantly shorter (p less than 0.001) with anodal pacing (mean 0.62 mA, 156 ms, respectively) than with pacing in either the cathodal (0.12 mA, 174 ms) or the bipolar (0.13 mA, 173 ms) mode. At a current intensity twice that of the excitability threshold, the introduction of one or two extrastimuli induced ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation comparably among the three pacing modes. However, when three extrastimuli were used, ventricular fibrillation was induced with anodal pacing twice as frequently (50 [61%] of 82 sites) as with either of the other two pacing modes (each 23 [28%] of 82 sites, p less than 0.001), whereas the induction of ventricular tachycardia remained comparable with anodal pacing (15 [18%] of 82 sites) and cathodal and bipolar pacing (each 14 [17%] of 82 sites). Furthermore, a similarly high incidence of inducibility of ventricular fibrillation was observed with both cathodal pacing (56 [68%] of 82 sites) and bipolar pacing (40 [49%] of 82 sites) when an increased current equal to twice the anodal excitability threshold (1.23 mA) was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

与单极阴极起搏相比,使用单极阳极或双极起搏据称会增加易感患者发生意外心室颤动的可能性。在本研究中,采用程控心室刺激,比较了11只患有慢性心肌梗死的犬82个心内膜下梗死周边部位,单极阴极、单极阳极和双极起搏模式引发持续性室性心动过速或颤动的能力。阳极起搏(平均分别为0.62 mA、156 ms)时,舒张晚期兴奋性阈值显著更高,心室不应期显著更短(p<0.001),相比阴极起搏(0.12 mA、174 ms)或双极起搏(0.13 mA、173 ms)模式。在电流强度为兴奋性阈值两倍时,三种起搏模式中引入一个或两个额外刺激诱发室性心动过速和心室颤动的情况相当。然而,当使用三个额外刺激时,阳极起搏诱发心室颤动的频率是其他两种起搏模式的两倍(82个部位中的50个[61%])(其他两种起搏模式各为82个部位中的23个[28%],p<0.001),而阳极起搏诱发室性心动过速的情况与阴极和双极起搏相当(82个部位中的15个[18%])(阴极和双极起搏各为82个部位中的14个[17%])。此外,当使用等于阳极兴奋性阈值两倍的增加电流(1.23 mA)时,阴极起搏(82个部位中的56个[68%])和双极起搏(82个部位中的40个[49%])诱发心室颤动的发生率同样很高。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验