Effects of unipolar cathodal and bipolar stimulation on vulnerability of ischemic ventricles to fibrillation.

The effects of unipolar and bipolar stimulation on ventricular fibrillation threshold were studied during acute occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery in 13 anesthetized dogs. Values for ventricular fibrillation threshold were determined by delivering trains of rapid bipolar or unipolar pulses (100/sec) during the vulnerable period. The mean threshold value was found to be 13.0 ma for bipolar, 13.9 ma for unipolar anodal and 21.0 ma for unipolar cathodal stimulation. Ventricular fibrillation threshold was significantly lower (P less than 0.01) with both unipolar anodal and bipolar stimulation than with unipolar cathodal stimulation. In these animals, the first premature beats induced by the rapid stimuli occurred significantly earlier with unipolar anodal and bipolar stimulation than with unipolar cathodal stimulation. The effect of competition of unipolar or bipolar pacing stimuli with normally conducted ventricular beats was also studied in a group of 16 dogs. Repeated trials of competitive pacing during coronary occlusion showed that the incidence of ventricular fibrillation was significantly greater (P less 0.05) with bipolar pacing (36 percent) than with unipolar cathodal pacing (15 percent). These results indicate that bipolar pacing is potentially more dangerous than unipolar cathodal pacing and suggest that the incidence of pacemaker-induced ventricular fibrillation might be further reduced by the use of unipolar cathodal stimulation during acute myocardial infarction.