Suppr超能文献

专业人士如何看待血管性认知障碍的特定护理建议?一项针对医疗保健专业人员的德尔菲研究。

What do Professionals Think of Specific Care Recommendations for Vascular Cognitive Impairment? A Delphi Study With Health Care Professionals.

作者信息

van de Schraaf Sara A J, Rhodius-Meester Hanneke F M, Muller Majon, Visser-Meily Johanna M A, de Vugt Marjolein E, Sizoo Eefje M, Hertogh Cees M P M

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Section, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 May;26(5):105546. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105546. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is an umbrella term covering all cognitive impairment from mild cognitive deficits to dementia due to vascular etiologies. VCI is highly prevalent within dementia and stroke care pathways, but specific recommendations for care for people with VCI are lacking. Therefore, we formulated specific recommendations for care for people with VCI and tested these in a panel of health care professionals.

DESIGN

Modified Delphi study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Purposefully sampled health care professionals in the dementia and stroke fields.

METHODS

Based on Dutch care standards for dementia and stroke and previous studies, the research team formulated 27 statements. In 3 rounds, participants were asked on a 4-point Likert scale how much they agreed with statements. They could elaborate on their answer in open fields. After each round, level of agreement was calculated. Subsequently, it was evaluated whether consensus was reached. Qualitative data guided potential modifications to the statements and was analyzed for overarching themes in argumentation.

RESULTS

Thirty-four participants (primary and secondary care physicians, nurses, psychologists, occupational therapists, and case managers in dementia care) were included in the expert panel. Of the formulated statements, 23 were accepted after 3 rounds. Accepted statements included recommendations on recognition and management of specific symptoms, awareness of care opportunities in and collaboration between care pathways and networks, and the importance of timely care. Some nuancing comments were raised on feasibility and specificity of the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Experts agreed on multiple specific recommendations for VCI care across the patient journey, balancing specific and targeted care with further integration of the different care networks. Despite some concerns on feasibility and the balance between disease-centered and person-centered care, the expert-agreed statements can provide guidance in striving toward tailored care and aid in bringing together stroke and dementia networks for people with VCI.

摘要

目的

血管性认知障碍(VCI)是一个统称,涵盖了由血管病因导致的从轻度认知缺陷到痴呆的所有认知障碍。VCI在痴呆症和中风护理路径中非常普遍,但缺乏针对VCI患者护理的具体建议。因此,我们制定了针对VCI患者护理的具体建议,并在一组医疗保健专业人员中进行了测试。

设计

改良德尔菲研究。

设置与参与者

有目的地抽取痴呆症和中风领域的医疗保健专业人员。

方法

基于荷兰痴呆症和中风护理标准以及先前的研究,研究团队制定了27条陈述。在三轮调查中,要求参与者以4点李克特量表表明他们对陈述的同意程度。他们可以在空白处详细阐述自己的答案。每轮调查后,计算同意程度。随后,评估是否达成共识。定性数据指导对陈述进行潜在修改,并分析论证中的总体主题。

结果

专家小组包括34名参与者(痴呆症护理中的初级和二级护理医生、护士、心理学家、职业治疗师和病例管理人员)。在制定的陈述中,经过三轮后有23条被接受。被接受的陈述包括关于特定症状的识别和管理、对护理路径和网络中的护理机会以及合作的认识,以及及时护理的重要性的建议。对建议的可行性和具体性提出了一些细微的意见。

结论与启示

专家们就VCI患者整个就医过程中的多项具体护理建议达成了一致,在提供具体针对性护理与进一步整合不同护理网络之间取得了平衡。尽管对可行性以及以疾病为中心和以人为本的护理之间的平衡存在一些担忧,但专家们达成一致的陈述可为努力实现个性化护理提供指导,并有助于将中风和痴呆症网络整合起来,为VCI患者提供帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验