Klugman Madelyn, Sampathkumar Yashasvini, Patil Sujata, Tringale Kathryn R, Montagna Giacomo, Finik Jackie, Kuo Ting-Ting, Eberle Carolyn, Pinkhasov Alexandr, Gillis Theresa, Gany Francesca, Blinder Victoria
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03654-x.
Lymphedema is a common problem that adversely impacts quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Although lymphedema risk is modifiable through behavior change, there is no standardized approach to educate survivors about risk-lowering strategies. Furthermore, misconceptions about lymphedema risk factors and risk-lowering strategies are common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of lymphedema therapy referral on knowledge about lymphedema risk.
This was a cross-sectional single institution study in which breast cancer survivors at a National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center completed an anonymous questionnaire between 2014 and 2015. Eligibility criteria were age ≥ 18, female sex, English-speaking, > 6 months post definitive breast cancer surgery, no cancer recurrence, and no prior or subsequent second cancer. The questionnaire included sociodemographic variables, clinical factors including prior lymphedema therapy referral, and 10 true/false questions assessing knowledge about lymphedema risk. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed the relationship between prior lymphedema therapy referral and correctly answering questions about lymphedema risk.
Of 209 participants, 53 (25%) had been referred to lymphedema therapy. Those who had undergone sentinel lymph node biopsy were less frequently referred to lymphedema therapy [15 (14%)] than those who had undergone axillary lymph node dissection [38 (39%)]. Five of the true/false questions had a correct response rate of < 80%. After controlling for age, race/ethnicity, education, type of axillary surgery, and receipt of radiation therapy, referral for lymphedema therapy was associated with correctly answering two questions about lymphedema: weight gain increases lymphedema risk [odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 3.63 (1.66-7.96)] and patients are recommended to exercise their arm on an airplane [2.65 (1.15-6.13)].
Misconceptions about lymphedema prevention and management are common among breast cancer survivors. Lymphedema therapy referral is a potential opportunity to debunk misunderstandings and educate at-risk patients regarding lymphedema.
淋巴水肿是一个常见问题,对乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量产生不利影响。尽管淋巴水肿风险可通过行为改变加以控制,但目前尚无标准化方法向幸存者传授降低风险的策略。此外,对淋巴水肿风险因素和降低风险策略存在误解的情况很常见。本研究的目的是评估淋巴水肿治疗转诊对淋巴水肿风险知识的影响。
这是一项在单一机构开展的横断面研究,美国国立癌症研究所指定癌症中心的乳腺癌幸存者于2014年至2015年期间完成了一份匿名问卷。纳入标准为年龄≥18岁、女性、说英语、确诊乳腺癌手术后超过6个月、无癌症复发且无既往或后续的第二种癌症。问卷包括社会人口统计学变量、临床因素(包括既往淋巴水肿治疗转诊情况)以及10道用于评估淋巴水肿风险知识的是非题。多变量逻辑回归分析评估既往淋巴水肿治疗转诊与正确回答淋巴水肿风险问题之间的关系。
在209名参与者中,53人(25%)曾被转诊接受淋巴水肿治疗。接受前哨淋巴结活检的患者被转诊接受淋巴水肿治疗的频率[15人(14%)]低于接受腋窝淋巴结清扫术的患者[38人(39%)]。10道是非题中有5道的正确回答率低于80%。在控制了年龄、种族/民族、教育程度、腋窝手术类型和放疗情况后,淋巴水肿治疗转诊与正确回答两道关于淋巴水肿的问题相关:体重增加会增加淋巴水肿风险[比值比,95%置信区间:3.63(1.66 - 7.96)]以及建议患者在飞机上活动手臂[2.65(1.15 - 6.13)]。
乳腺癌幸存者中对淋巴水肿预防和管理存在误解的情况很常见。淋巴水肿治疗转诊是消除误解并对有风险的患者进行淋巴水肿教育的一个潜在契机。