2020年后康复医学期刊系统评价的报告与方法学质量：一项横断面Meta流行病学研究

Reporting and Methodological Qualities of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation Journals After 2020: A Cross-Sectional Meta-Epidemiological Study.

作者信息

Tsuge Takahiro, Yamamoto Norio, Tomita Yosuke, Hagiyama Akikazu, Shiratsuchi Daijo, Kato Yukiko, Taito Shunsuke, Yorifuji Takashi

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, Kurashiki Medical Centre, Kurashiki, Okayama 710-8522, Japan.

Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2025 Apr 2;105(4). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaf032.

DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzaf032

PMID:40089987

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the reporting and methodological qualities in systematic reviews (SRs) of rehabilitation journals following updating to the use of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement.

METHODS

SRs with pairwise meta-analyses on the effects of health interventions were selected, which were published in rehabilitation journals in 2020, 2021, and 2022 using MEDLINE (PubMed). Exposure was defined as reporting use of the PRISMA 2020 statement. A comparison group consisted of SRs that did not use the PRISMA 2020 statement. The adherence of the PRISMA 2020 items, PRISMA 2020 for abstracts, and A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 items were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirteen thousand, three hundred eighty-one articles were identified after conducting a search on April 2, 2023. The study included 100 articles each that used and those that did not use the PRISMA 2020 statement. Of 41 items in the PRISMA 2020 statement, 48.8% (20/41) adhered to ≥80% of each item for those that used the PRISMA 2020 statement and 41.5% (17/41) in those that did not use the PRISMA 2020 statement. The PRISMA 2020 statement did not lead to any major improvement, and only a slight improvement of 9.8% (4/41) was observed when compared with those that did not use the PRISMA 2020 statement. Similarly, no item improved in the PRISMA 2020 for abstracts, and only 5.6% (1/18) improved in the AMSTAR 2 items.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that reporting use of the PRISMA 2020 statement did not result in any major improvements; however, only a slight improvement was observed in the reporting and methodological qualities of SRs in rehabilitation journals. Researchers should adhere to each item in the PRISMA 2020 statement in SRs published in rehabilitation journals.

IMPACT

The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in rehabilitation journals is insufficient. It is important to improve the reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in rehabilitation journals. It is recommended that researchers not only declare their reporting use of the PRISMA 2020 statement, but also adhere to each item correctly.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查康复期刊系统评价（SRs）在更新采用《系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目》（PRISMA）2020声明后的报告质量和方法学质量。

方法

选取2020年、2021年和2022年发表在康复期刊上、采用MEDLINE（PubMed）进行成对Meta分析以评估健康干预效果的SRs。暴露定义为报告采用PRISMA 2020声明。对照组由未采用PRISMA 2020声明的SRs组成。对PRISMA 2020项目、PRISMA 2020摘要版以及评估系统评价的测量工具（AMSTAR）2项目的依从性进行评估。

结果

在2023年4月2日进行检索后，共识别出13381篇文章。该研究纳入了各100篇采用和未采用PRISMA 2020声明的文章。在PRISMA 2020声明的41个项目中，采用PRISMA 2020声明的文章中有48.8%（20/41）的项目每个项目的依从率≥80%，未采用PRISMA 2020声明的文章中这一比例为41.5%（17/41）。PRISMA 2020声明未带来任何重大改进，与未采用PRISMA 2020声明的文章相比，仅观察到9.8%（4/41）的轻微改进。同样，PRISMA 2020摘要版中没有项目得到改进，AMSTAR 2项目中只有5.6%（1/18）得到改进。