Potempa Marc, Hart Peter C, Rajab Ibraheem M, Potempa Lawrence A
Acphazin Inc., Deerfield, IL, United States.
College of Science, Health, and Pharmacy, Roosevelt University, Schaumburg, IL, United States.
Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 28;16:1564607. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1564607. eCollection 2025.
Most early studies investigating the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in tissue damage determined it supported pro-hemostatic and pro-inflammatory activities. However, these findings were not universal, as other data suggested CRP inhibited these same processes. A potential explanation for these disparate observations finally emerged with the recognition that CRP undergoes context-dependent conformational changes , and each of its three isoforms - pentameric CRP (pCRP), modified pentameric CRP (pCRP*), and monomeric CRP (mCRP) - have different effects. In this review, we consider this new paradigm and re-evaluate the role of CRP and its isoforms in the tissue repair process. Indeed, a growing body of evidence points toward the involvement of CRP not just in hemostasis and inflammation, but also in the resolution of inflammation and in tissue regeneration. Additionally, we briefly discuss the shortcomings of the currently available diagnostic tests for CRP and highlight the need for change in how CRP is currently utilized in clinical practice.
大多数早期研究探讨了C反应蛋白(CRP)在组织损伤中的作用,结果表明它支持促止血和促炎活性。然而,这些发现并不具有普遍性,因为其他数据表明CRP会抑制这些相同的过程。随着人们认识到CRP会发生依赖于环境的构象变化,并且其三种异构体——五聚体CRP(pCRP)、修饰五聚体CRP(pCRP*)和单体CRP(mCRP)——各有不同作用,这些不同观察结果的一个潜在解释终于出现了。在这篇综述中,我们考虑这种新范式,并重新评估CRP及其异构体在组织修复过程中的作用。的确,越来越多的证据表明,CRP不仅参与止血和炎症反应,还参与炎症的消退和组织再生。此外,我们简要讨论了目前可用的CRP诊断测试的缺点,并强调了改变目前临床实践中CRP使用方式的必要性。