A shared gene but distinct dynamics regulate mimicry polymorphisms in closely related species.

Sex-limited polymorphisms, such as mating strategies in male birds and mimicry in female butterflies, are widespread across the tree of life and are frequently adaptive. Considerable work has been done exploring the ecological pressures and evolutionary forces that generate and maintain genetic variation resulting in alternative sex-limited morphs, yet little is known about their molecular and developmental genetic basis. A powerful system to investigate this is butterflies: within the subgenus multiple closely related species have female-limited mimicry polymorphism, with females developing either derived mimetic or ancestral non-mimetic wing color patterns. While mimetic color patterns are different between species, each polymorphism is controlled by allelic variation of (). Across several species, we found that the mimetic and non-mimetic females develop male-like color patterns when we knockdown expression, establishing that controls both sexual dimorphism and polymorphism. We also found that mimetic alleles have unique spatiotemporal expression patterns between two species, and To uncover the downstream genes involved in the color pattern switch between both species, we used RNA-seq in and compared the results to previous work in . While some canonical wing patterning genes are differentially expressed in females of both species, the temporal patterns of differential expression are notably different. Our results indicate that, despite the putative ancestral co-option and shared use of among closely related species, the mimicry switch functions through distinct underlying mechanisms.