Lee Sangil, Suh Michelle, Ragsdale Luna, Seidenfeld Justine, van Oppen James D, Lapointe-Shaw Lauren, Hooper Carolina Diniz, Jaramillo James, Wescott Annie B, Hirata Kaiho, Kennedy Maura, Comasco Lauren Cameron, Carpenter Christopher R, Hogan Teresita M, Liu Shan W
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Section of emergency medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
medRxiv. 2025 Mar 3:2025.02.28.25323113. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.28.25323113.
The increasing prevalence of dementia poses significant challenges for emergency department (ED) care, as persons living with dementia (PLWD) more frequently experience adverse outcomes such as delirium, prolonged stays, and higher mortality rates. Despite advancements in care strategies, a critical gap remains in understanding how ED interventions impact outcomes in this vulnerable population. This systematic review aims to identify evidence-based ED care interventions tailored to PLWD to improve outcomes.
A systematic review was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library (Wiley), Scopus (Elsevier), and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global through September 2024. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024586555). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and quality improvement initiatives focused on ED interventions for PLWD. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, ED revisits, functional decline, and mortality.
From 3,305 screened studies, six met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included nonpharmacologic therapies (e.g., music and light therapy), specialized geriatric ED units, and assessment tools, such as for pain. Tailored interventions including geriatric emergency units and community paramedic care transitions were effective in reducing 30-day ED revisits and hospitalizations. However, heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes precluded meta-analysis. Risk of bias ranged from low to moderate.
This review underscores the urgent need for standardized and evidence-based interventions in ED settings for PLWD. Approaches including multidisciplinary care models and non-pharmacologic therapies demonstrated potential for improving outcomes. Future research should prioritize consistent outcome measures, interdisciplinary collaboration, and person-centered care strategies to enhance the quality and equity of ED services for PLWD.
痴呆症患病率的不断上升给急诊科护理带来了重大挑战,因为痴呆症患者(PLWD)更频繁地经历诸如谵妄、住院时间延长和死亡率升高等不良后果。尽管护理策略有所进步,但在了解急诊科干预措施如何影响这一弱势群体的结局方面仍存在关键差距。本系统评价旨在确定针对PLWD的循证急诊科护理干预措施,以改善结局。
截至2024年9月,在Ovid MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆(Wiley)、Scopus(Elsevier)和ProQuest全球博硕士论文数据库中进行了系统评价。该评价方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42024586555)上注册。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验、观察性研究以及侧重于PLWD急诊科干预措施的质量改进举措。由两名评审员独立进行数据提取和质量评估,通过讨论解决分歧。结局包括患者满意度、急诊科复诊、功能衰退和死亡率。
在3305项筛选研究中,有6项符合纳入标准。干预措施包括非药物疗法(如音乐和光疗法)、专门的老年急诊科以及疼痛评估工具等。包括老年急诊科和社区护理人员护理过渡在内的针对性干预措施在减少30天急诊科复诊和住院方面有效。然而,研究设计和结局的异质性排除了进行荟萃分析的可能性。偏倚风险从低到中等。
本评价强调了在急诊科为PLWD提供标准化循证干预措施的迫切需求。包括多学科护理模式和非药物疗法在内的方法显示出改善结局的潜力。未来的研究应优先考虑一致的结局测量、跨学科合作以及以患者为中心的护理策略,以提高PLWD急诊科服务的质量和公平性。