Chary Anita N, Suh Michelle, Bhananker Annika, Hernandez Norvin, Rivera Ana Paulina, Boyer Ed, Kunik Mark E, Shah Manish N, Ritchie Christine, Naik Aanand D, Liu Shan W, Kennedy Maura
Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 2450 Holcombe Blvd., Suite 01Y, Houston, TX, 77021, USA.
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 7. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03797-z.
ED crowding and boarding adversely impact older patients' care and outcomes. Little is known about how ED crowding impacts persons living with dementia, a vulnerable population. This study sought to explore ED experiences of caregivers of people with dementia during a period of ED crowding and boarding. We performed semi-structured interviews with caregivers of people with dementia with an ED visit during a period of ED crowding and boarding at two public hospitals experiencing a threefold increase in boarding from pre-pandemic levels. Participants were recruited via chart review. We coded data using an inductive approach. Three themes emerged from 29 caregiver interviews: (1) difficulty obtaining assistance, (2) patient harms, and (3) concerns about triage and rooming processes. First, caregivers described having to be proactive to obtain symptom control and assistance with mobility. Second, caregivers observed harms of noise and stimulation provoking agitation and delays in administration of routine medications. Third, caregivers felt it was inappropriate for people with dementia to receive care in waiting room chairs or to receive prolonged hallway care. Caregivers advocated for preferential considerations for rooming and rapid assessment to avoid agitation, facilitatd access to ED staff, and promote patient comfort. Caregivers of people with dementia associated ED environments with difficulty obtaining assistance, patient harms, and triage concerns. Strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of ED crowding on people with dementia should focus on environmental modifications, uptriage of people with dementia, supporting activities of daily living and mobility, and innovation around patient disposition.
急诊科拥挤和滞留对老年患者的护理及预后产生不利影响。对于急诊科拥挤如何影响痴呆症患者(这一弱势群体),我们知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨在急诊科拥挤和滞留期间,痴呆症患者照料者在急诊科的经历。我们对两家公立医院急诊科拥挤和滞留期间有过就诊经历的痴呆症患者照料者进行了半结构式访谈,这两家医院的滞留人数比疫情前水平增加了两倍。参与者通过病历审查招募。我们采用归纳法对数据进行编码。从29名照料者的访谈中浮现出三个主题:(1)获得帮助困难,(2)患者受到伤害,(3)对分诊和安置流程的担忧。首先,照料者描述了必须积极主动才能获得症状控制和行动辅助。其次,照料者观察到噪音和刺激会引发痴呆症患者的躁动,并导致常规药物给药延迟,从而造成伤害。第三,照料者认为让痴呆症患者坐在候诊椅上接受治疗或在走廊接受长时间治疗是不合适的。照料者主张在安置方面给予优先考虑,并进行快速评估,以避免患者躁动,方便患者接触急诊科工作人员,并提高患者舒适度。痴呆症患者的照料者将急诊科环境与获得帮助困难、患者受到伤害以及分诊问题联系在一起。减轻急诊科拥挤对痴呆症患者负面影响的策略应侧重于环境改造、对痴呆症患者进行优先分诊、支持日常生活活动和行动能力,以及围绕患者处置进行创新。