Cretu Stefana, Iorga Denis, Dascalu Mihai, Salavastru Carmen Maria
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Dermatology Research Unit, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Stefan cel Mare Street no 19-21, Bucharest, Romania.
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Mar 17;317(1):578. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-04104-2.
With yet unclear pathogenesis, acne mechanica associated to medical face masks(MFM) gained increased attention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Between November 2021-January 2022 we conducted an exploratory, cross-sectional study evaluating the differences between the glabella and cheek-chin junction using clinical examination, fluorescent photography (FP), videodermatoscopy and in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM). Medical doctors from our country and 6th year medical students were invited. Participants self-identified as consistent MFM users during work hours. We analysed 19,432 images from 14 consecutive subjects, 11 females, 3 males, mean age,29.93 years (SD = 4.69). Clinical examination revealed more inflammatory lesions on the cheeks and chin (+ 9.35;95%CI + 2.31to + 16.39;d = 0.76, P =.01). FP considered ultraviolet red fluorescing spots(UVRFs) from the glabella and the cheek-chin junction, with significantly more spots in the former (+ 5.43;95%CI + 2.64to + 8.20; d = 1.12; P =.001). The average area in mm covered by the spots was significantly larger in the glabella (+ 3.26;95%CI + 1.43to + 5.08;d = 1.02; P =.002). RCM considered 9546 follicles, 4966 from the glabella, and 4580 from the cheek-chin junction. The cheek-chin junction had a significantly higher proportion of hyperkeratotic follicles than the glabella (+ 9%;95%CI + 2%to + 16%;d = 0.79;P =.01). In the dermal-epidermal junction, the cheek-chin region had a significantly higher proportion of follicles with signs of inflammation than the glabella (+ 10%;95% CI + 3%to + 18%; d = 0.80; P =.010). Perifollicular stratum corneum thickness was significantly lower in the cheek-chin junction, 19.56 μm (SD = 4.84) compared to the glabella, 24.25 μm (± 4.93) (-4 μm;95% CI-1 μm to- 8 μm; r =.88; P =.01). The distribution of UVRFs, known to correlate with microbial activity and sebum production, is similar to pre-pandemic studies, suggesting that in acne mechanica associated to MFM, follicular hyperkeratinisation, inflammation, and irritation, may outweigh other possible alterations.
在发病机制尚不明确的情况下,与医用口罩(MFM)相关的机械性痤疮在新冠疫情期间受到了更多关注。2021年11月至2022年1月,我们进行了一项探索性横断面研究,通过临床检查、荧光摄影(FP)、视频皮肤镜检查和体内反射共聚焦显微镜(RCM)评估眉间与脸颊 - 下巴交界处的差异。我们邀请了本国的医生和六年级医学生参与。参与者自我认定为在工作时间持续使用MFM。我们分析了14名连续受试者的19432张图像,其中11名女性,3名男性,平均年龄29.93岁(标准差 = 4.69)。临床检查发现脸颊和下巴上的炎性皮损更多(+9.35;95%置信区间 +2.31至 +16.39;d = 0.76,P = 0.01)。FP观察眉间和脸颊 - 下巴交界处的紫外线红色荧光斑点(UVRFs),前者的斑点明显更多(+5.43;95%置信区间 +2.64至 +8.20;d = 1.12;P = 0.001)。斑点覆盖的平均面积(平方毫米)在眉间明显更大(+3.26;95%置信区间 +1.43至 +5.08;d = 1.02;P = 0.002)。RCM观察了9546个毛囊,其中4966个来自眉间,4580个来自脸颊 - 下巴交界处。脸颊 - 下巴交界处的角化过度毛囊比例明显高于眉间(+9%;95%置信区间 +2%至 +16%;d = 0.79;P = 0.01)。在真皮 - 表皮交界处,脸颊 - 下巴区域有炎症迹象的毛囊比例明显高于眉间(+10%;95%置信区间 +3%至 +18%;d = 0.80;P = 0.010)。脸颊 - 下巴交界处的毛囊周围角质层厚度明显更低,为19.56μm(标准差 = 4.84),而眉间为24.25μm(±4.93)(-4μm;95%置信区间 -1μm至 -8μm;r = 0.88;P = 0.01)。已知与微生物活性和皮脂分泌相关的UVRFs分布与疫情前的研究相似,这表明在与MFM相关的机械性痤疮中,毛囊角化过度、炎症和刺激可能比其他可能的改变更为突出。