• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从偷听人类之间的交流中学到的东西会改变马(家马)的觅食地点选择。

Learning from eavesdropping on human-human encounters changes feeding location choice in horses (Equus Caballus).

作者信息

Krueger Konstanze, Roll Anika, Beyer Anna J, Föll Angela, Bernau Maren, Farmer Kate

机构信息

Department of Equine Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Economics and Management, Nuertingen-Geislingen University, Neckarsteige 6-10, 72622, Nürtingen, Germany.

Zoology/Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2025 Mar 17;28(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01946-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-025-01946-1
PMID:40095148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11913996/
Abstract

When animals observe human signals, they may learn from them. Such learning from humans has been reported for intentional communication between humans with animals, but animals might also learn socially by observing unintentional information transfer when eavesdropping on humans-human encounters. In this study, 12 of 17 horses significantly changed their preference for a feeding location after observing approval in a human-human interaction there, and horses kept in social housing adapted in a higher percentage of trials to human-human demonstrations than those in individual housing. This indicates, for the first time, that some animals change their feeding strategies after eavesdropping on human-human demonstrations and that this adaptation may be dependent on social experience. As horses maintained the observed preference for a feeding location when the demonstrators were absent, we suggest that they learned by applying individual and social learning mechanisms. The horses social rank, age and sex did not affect their learning performance. However, particular demonstrators tended to have a stronger impact on the horses' performance. Future research should further investigate the durability of this preference change in the absence of repeated demonstrations, and establish whether long-term social learning sets in. This would have important implications for unintentional long-term impacts of human interactions on interspecies communication.

摘要

当动物观察人类信号时,它们可能会从中学习。这种向人类学习的现象已在人类与动物之间的有意交流中有所报道,但动物也可能通过在偷听人类之间的互动时观察无意的信息传递来进行社会学习。在本研究中,17匹马中有12匹在观察到人类之间在某一喂食地点的互动获得认可后,显著改变了它们对该喂食地点的偏好,并且群居的马在更多比例的试验中能适应人类之间的示范行为,相比单独饲养的马。这首次表明,一些动物在偷听人类之间的示范行为后会改变它们的进食策略,并且这种适应可能依赖于社会经验。由于当示范者不在场时,马仍保持对观察到的喂食地点的偏好,我们认为它们是通过应用个体学习和社会学习机制来学习的。马的社会等级、年龄和性别并未影响它们的学习表现。然而,特定的示范者往往对马的表现有更强的影响。未来的研究应进一步调查在没有重复示范的情况下这种偏好变化的持久性,并确定长期的社会学习是否会发生。这将对人类互动对种间交流的无意长期影响具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/11913996/d94990e214e0/10071_2025_1946_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/11913996/c6fce2b19b27/10071_2025_1946_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/11913996/e69f1f2ce224/10071_2025_1946_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/11913996/d94990e214e0/10071_2025_1946_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/11913996/c6fce2b19b27/10071_2025_1946_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/11913996/e69f1f2ce224/10071_2025_1946_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79f6/11913996/d94990e214e0/10071_2025_1946_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning from eavesdropping on human-human encounters changes feeding location choice in horses (Equus Caballus).从偷听人类之间的交流中学到的东西会改变马(家马)的觅食地点选择。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Mar 17;28(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01946-1.
2
Social learning across species: horses (Equus caballus) learn from humans by observation.跨物种的社会学习:马(家马)通过观察向人类学习。
Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):567-573. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1060-8. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
3
The effects of age, rank and neophobia on social learning in horses.年龄、等级和新事物恐惧症对马的社会学习的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2014 May;17(3):645-55. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0696-x. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
4
How do horses (Equus caballus) learn from observing human action?马(Equus caballus)如何通过观察人类的动作来学习?
Anim Cogn. 2020 Jan;23(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01310-0. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
5
Social feeding decisions in horses (Equus caballus).马(Equus caballus)的群体进食决策。
Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Jan 20.
6
Effects of size and personality on social learning and human-directed behaviour in horses (Equus caballus).大小和个性对马(Equus caballus)的社会学习和人类导向行为的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Nov;22(6):1001-1011. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01291-0. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
7
Cognition and learning in horses (Equus caballus): What we know and why we should ask more.马(Equus caballus)的认知与学习:我们所知道的以及为何我们应该进一步探究。
Behav Processes. 2016 May;126:121-31. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
8
Domestic horses (Equus caballus) prefer to approach humans displaying a submissive body posture rather than a dominant body posture.家马(Equus caballus)更喜欢接近表现出顺从身体姿势而非主导身体姿势的人类。
Anim Cogn. 2018 Mar;21(2):307-312. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1140-4. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
9
Horse sense: social status of horses (Equus caballus) affects their likelihood of copying other horses' behavior.常识:马(家马)的社会地位会影响它们模仿其他马行为的可能性。
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):431-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0133-0. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
10
Horses (Equus caballus) use human local enhancement cues and adjust to human attention.马(Equus caballus)利用人类局部增强线索并适应人类注意力。
Anim Cogn. 2011 Mar;14(2):187-201. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0352-7. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Do dogs form reputations of humans? No effect of age after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation.狗会形成对人类的看法吗?在给予食物的情境中,间接和直接体验后年龄没有影响。
Anim Cogn. 2025 Jun 28;28(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01967-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analyses reveal support for the Social Intelligence Hypothesis.元分析结果支持社会智力假说。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Oct;99(5):1889-1908. doi: 10.1111/brv.13103. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Culturally determined interspecies communication between humans and honeyguides.人类与蜜导鸟之间由文化决定的种间交流。
Science. 2023 Dec 8;382(6675):1155-1158. doi: 10.1126/science.adh4129. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
What drives horse success at following human-given cues? An investigation of handler familiarity and living conditions.
是什么驱使马在跟随人类给出的提示时取得成功?对驯马师的熟悉程度和生活条件的调查。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1283-1294. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01775-0. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
4
Emulative learning of a two-step task in free-ranging domestic pigs.自由放养家猪两步任务的模仿学习。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jun;26(3):929-942. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01740-3. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
5
Single housing but not changes in group composition causes stress-related immunomodulations in horses.单圈饲养但不改变群体组成会导致马的应激相关免疫调节。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 17;17(8):e0272445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272445. eCollection 2022.
6
Animal cognition in an urbanised world.城市化世界中的动物认知
Front Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 4;9. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.633947.
7
Basic Needs in Horses?-A Literature Review.马匹的基本需求?-文献综述
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 16;11(6):1798. doi: 10.3390/ani11061798.
8
Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?狗会在人类帮助的情况下偷听人类的互动吗?
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 26;15(8):e0237373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237373. eCollection 2020.
9
Non-invasive stress evaluation in domestic horses (): impact of housing conditions on sensory laterality and immunoglobulin A.家马的非侵入性应激评估():饲养条件对感觉偏侧性和免疫球蛋白A的影响
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Feb 19;7(2):191994. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191994. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Food Cleaning by Japanese Macaques: Innate, Innovative or Cultural?日本猕猴的食物清洗行为:是本能、创新还是文化行为?
Folia Primatol (Basel). 2020;91(4):433-444. doi: 10.1159/000506127. Epub 2020 Feb 26.