Centre for Evolutionary Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, 205b Culloden Road, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Oct;99(5):1889-1908. doi: 10.1111/brv.13103. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
The Social Intelligence Hypothesis (SIH) is one of the leading explanations for the evolution of cognition. Since its inception a vast body of literature investigating the predictions of the SIH has accumulated, using a variety of methodologies and species. However, the generalisability of the hypothesis remains unclear. To gain an understanding of the robustness of the SIH as an explanation for the evolution of cognition, we systematically searched the literature for studies investigating the predictions of the SIH. Accordingly, we compiled 103 studies with 584 effect sizes from 17 taxonomic orders. We present the results of four meta-analyses which reveal support for the SIH across interspecific, intraspecific and developmental studies. However, effect sizes did not differ significantly between the cognitive or sociality metrics used, taxonomy or testing conditions. Thus, support for the SIH is similar across studies using neuroanatomy and cognitive performance, those using broad categories of sociality, group size and social interactions, across taxonomic groups, and for tests conducted in captivity or the wild. Overall, our meta-analyses support the SIH as an evolutionary and developmental explanation for cognitive variation.
社会智力假说(SIH)是认知进化的主要解释之一。自其创立以来,已经积累了大量使用各种方法和物种来研究 SIH 预测的文献。然而,该假说的普遍性仍不清楚。为了深入了解 SIH 作为认知进化解释的稳健性,我们系统地搜索了文献,以寻找研究 SIH 预测的研究。因此,我们从 17 个分类阶元中编译了 103 项研究,其中包含 584 个效应量。我们呈现了四项荟萃分析的结果,这些分析表明 SIH 支持跨种间、种内和发展研究。然而,使用的认知或社会性指标、分类或测试条件之间的效应大小没有显著差异。因此,使用神经解剖学和认知表现、使用社会性、群体大小和社会互动的广泛类别、跨分类群以及在圈养或野外进行测试的研究都支持 SIH。总的来说,我们的荟萃分析支持 SIH 作为认知变异的进化和发展解释。