Suppr超能文献

痴呆症诊断与抗痴呆药物处方:对德国报销数据的分析(2006 - 2016年)

Dementia diagnosis and prescription of antidementia drugs: An analysis of German claims data (2006-2016).

作者信息

Becker Cornelia, Herschung Lucas, Gomm Willy, Haenisch Britta

机构信息

Research Department, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany.

Pharmacoepidemiology, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Apr;104(3):698-708. doi: 10.1177/13872877251319468. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

Abstract

BackgroundUse of claims data allows to analyze health service characteristics of dementia, which is one of the most frequent cognitive disorders in Germany and worldwide.ObjectiveThe study aimed at describing the variability in dementia diagnoses and in antidementia drug prescription pattern.MethodsWe analyzed data from a population-based sample of one of the largest German statutory health insurances. The cohort included 30,403 patients with incident dementia diagnosis from 2006-2016. We described frequencies, patterns, and interrelations of diagnoses (Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia, other specific dementia, unspecified dementia (UD), antidementia drugs (ADD), and professional groups. We described switches in diagnostic and medication patterns between index quarter and following quarters, and evaluated the prescriptions in relation to national guidelines.ResultsA total of 87% of patients received a diagnosis of UD in at least one quarter of insurance. In the quarter of incident diagnosis, 14% of patients received more than one diagnostic code of dementia, whereas over the course of observation, the majority of patients received more than one diagnostic code (61%). Most patients were diagnosed by a general practitioner without involving a specialist. All professional groups primarily made UD diagnoses except specialists who mainly diagnosed AD. Thirty-five percent of all patients and 67% of AD patients were prescribed an ADD at least once.ConclusionsSpecialists made the most specific diagnoses and prescribed most ADDs. A specialist consultation may be advisable, but only 34% of patients visited one. Many AD patients might be left untreated due to underdiagnosis or -treatment.

摘要

背景

使用索赔数据有助于分析痴呆症的医疗服务特征,痴呆症是德国乃至全球最常见的认知障碍之一。

目的

本研究旨在描述痴呆症诊断及抗痴呆药物处方模式的变异性。

方法

我们分析了德国最大的法定医疗保险之一的一项基于人群的样本数据。该队列包括2006年至2016年期间30403例新发痴呆症诊断患者。我们描述了诊断(阿尔茨海默病(AD)、血管性痴呆、其他特定痴呆、未特定的痴呆(UD))、抗痴呆药物(ADD)和专业组别的频率、模式及相互关系。我们描述了索引季度与随后各季度之间诊断和用药模式的转变,并根据国家指南评估了处方情况。

结果

共有87%的患者在至少一个保险季度中被诊断为UD。在新发诊断的季度中,14%的患者有不止一个痴呆症诊断代码,而在观察期间,大多数患者有不止一个诊断代码(61%)。大多数患者由全科医生诊断,未涉及专科医生。除主要诊断AD的专科医生外,所有专业组主要做出UD诊断。所有患者中有35%以及AD患者中有67%至少有一次被开具ADD处方。

结论

专科医生做出的诊断最明确,开具的ADD处方最多。建议进行专科医生会诊,但只有34%的患者就诊。由于诊断不足或治疗不足,许多AD患者可能得不到治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d793/12231858/c909e548fb92/10.1177_13872877251319468-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验