Zwierz Aleksander, Staszak Marta, Scheich Matthias, Domagalski Krzysztof, Hackenberg Stephan, Burduk Paweł
Department of Otolaryngology, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 1;14(5):1681. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051681.
The aim of this study was to analyse the results of the mastoid obliteration technique with sticky bone (SB) and compare them with those obtained using bioactive glass S53P4 (BAG). This prospective preliminary study comprised 28 adults who underwent canal wall down (CWD) surgery using two mastoid obliterative techniques: SB ( = 21) or BAG ( = 7). The SB group was treated with the patients' own bone dust and injectable platelet rich fibrin (IPRF) ( = 13%) or bone dust, IPRF, and additionally allogenic lyophilised demineralised bone ( = 9%). Nine months after the surgery, in the SB group, retroauricular depression was observed in three (14%) patients, temporary retroauricular fistula in one (5%), and a conical and smooth external auditory canal (EAC) was achieved in 15 (71%). Mean EAC capacity was 0.6 mL higher than in the contralateral ear. In the SB group, the tympanic membrane (TM) of nineteen (91%) patients was fully healed, one (5%) had TM perforation, and one (5%) developed a retraction pocket. In the BAG group, retroauricular depression was observed in four (57%) patients, temporary retroauricular fistula was present in one (14%), and a conical and smooth EAC was achieved in five (71%). Mean EAC capacity was 0.3 mL higher than on the opposite side. In the BAG group, we stated six (86%) patients with fully healed TM and one (14%) with a retraction pocket. One cholesteatoma was found in the BAG group and two in SB, (14% vs. 10%). After 9 months, all patients in both groups achieved a dry and self-cleaning cavity. Mastoid obliteration in CWD surgery using SB or BAG allows for reconstruction of the conical shape of the EAC with a volume similar to that of a healthy ear. Both techniques seem to have a minimal risk of complications and result in a dry, self-cleaning cavity. Further studies concerning a larger series of cases are necessary to confirm the findings of this preliminary analysis.
本研究的目的是分析使用粘性骨(SB)进行乳突填充技术的结果,并将其与使用生物活性玻璃S53P4(BAG)获得的结果进行比较。这项前瞻性初步研究纳入了28名接受开放式乳突根治术(CWD)的成年人,他们采用了两种乳突填充技术:SB(n = 21)或BAG(n = 7)。SB组使用患者自身的骨粉和可注射富血小板纤维蛋白(IPRF)(n = 13%)或骨粉、IPRF,另外还使用同种异体冻干脱矿骨(n = 9%)进行治疗。手术后9个月,在SB组中,3名(14%)患者出现耳后凹陷,1名(5%)出现暂时性耳后瘘管,15名(71%)患者获得了圆锥形且光滑的外耳道(EAC)。平均EAC容量比健侧耳高0.6 mL。在SB组中,19名(91%)患者的鼓膜(TM)完全愈合,1名(5%)患者出现TM穿孔,1名(5%)患者形成了内陷袋。在BAG组中,4名(57%)患者出现耳后凹陷,1名(14%)患者存在暂时性耳后瘘管,5名(71%)患者获得了圆锥形且光滑的EAC。平均EAC容量比另一侧高0.3 mL。在BAG组中,我们记录到6名(86%)患者的TM完全愈合,1名(14%)患者出现内陷袋。在BAG组中发现1例胆脂瘤,在SB组中发现2例(14%对10%)。9个月后,两组所有患者的术腔均干燥且可自洁。在CWD手术中使用SB或BAG进行乳突填充可重建EAC的圆锥形,其容积与健康耳相似。两种技术的并发症风险似乎都很低,并能形成干燥、可自洁的术腔。有必要进行关于更大病例系列的进一步研究,以证实这项初步分析的结果。