Li Meng, Fass Ofer Z, Carlson Dustin A, Pitisuttithum Panyavee, Goudie Eric, Kristinsdottir Kristjana, Kaklamanos Evandros, Etemadi Mozziyar, Keswani Rajesh N, Ellison Ashton, Konda Vani J A, Pandolfino John E
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
Kenneth C. Griffin Esophageal Center of Northwestern Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Jul;37(7):e70024. doi: 10.1111/nmo.70024. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
Endoscopy can detect features indicative of esophageal dysmotility, but standardized approaches for diagnosing achalasia based on these findings remain limited. Recently, the CARS score was developed to address this gap. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of endoscopy in identifying achalasia, using the STARD framework and current reference standards.
Adult patients with esophageal symptoms were prospectively enrolled from 2018 to 2023 and evaluated using endoscopy, esophageal manometry, FLIP panometry, and barium esophagram. The CARS score was assigned to endoscopic videos by two raters blinded to other clinical details. The diagnostic accuracy of the CARS score for predicting achalasia, based on Chicago Classification v4.0, was assessed through two interpretation methods: binary cutoffs for the total score and a classification tree model.
316 patients were included: 115 patients with achalasia (36%), 113 with normal motility (36%), and 88 with other manometric findings (28%). A CARS score ≥ 4 demonstrated 72% sensitivity and 99% specificity for achalasia, while a score ≥ 3 had 83% sensitivity and 96% specificity. The optimal classification tree had three levels (resistance score at the top, followed by anatomy and content scores, with hernia presence at the bottom) and had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity 92% for achalasia.
Endoscopy can accurately identify achalasia with high specificity using the CARS score. While motility testing to confirm an achalasia diagnosis remains essential prior to therapy, a high CARS score may help in the early identification of achalasia, especially in settings where motility testing is not readily available.
内镜检查可检测出提示食管动力障碍的特征,但基于这些发现诊断贲门失弛缓症的标准化方法仍然有限。最近,CARS评分应运而生以填补这一空白。本研究旨在使用STARD框架和当前参考标准评估内镜检查在识别贲门失弛缓症方面的诊断效用。
2018年至2023年对有食管症状的成年患者进行前瞻性招募,并使用内镜检查、食管测压、FLIP容积测压法和食管钡餐造影进行评估。两名对其他临床细节不知情的评估者为内镜视频分配CARS评分。基于芝加哥分类v4.0,通过两种解释方法评估CARS评分预测贲门失弛缓症的诊断准确性:总分的二元截断值和分类树模型。
纳入316例患者:115例贲门失弛缓症患者(36%),113例动力正常患者(36%),88例有其他测压结果的患者(28%)。CARS评分≥4对贲门失弛缓症的敏感性为72%,特异性为99%,而评分≥3的敏感性为83%,特异性为96%。最佳分类树有三个层次(顶部为阻力评分,其次是解剖和内容评分,底部为是否存在疝),对贲门失弛缓症的敏感性为90%,特异性为92%。
内镜检查使用CARS评分可准确且高度特异性地识别贲门失弛缓症。虽然在治疗前进行动力测试以确认贲门失弛缓症诊断仍然至关重要,但高CARS评分可能有助于早期识别贲门失弛缓症,特别是在无法轻易进行动力测试的情况下。