Carlson Dustin A, Li Meng, Fass Ofer, Pitisuttithum Panyavee, Goudie Eric, Kou Wenjun, Keswani Rajesh N, Pandolfino John E
Kenneth C. Griffin Esophageal Center of Northwestern Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kenneth C. Griffin Esophageal Center of Northwestern Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.03.1329.
Upper endoscopy and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry offer a complementary approach to diagnose esophageal motility disorders during the sedated endoscopy encounter. This study aimed to evaluate an approach combining an endoscopic motility score (CARS) and FLIP panometry to diagnosis esophageal motility disorders.
Adult patients who completed upper endoscopy with FLIP and high-resolution manometry (HRM) were included. Endoscopic videos were reviewed to determine the CARS score. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening and contractility profile were applied to derive a FLIP panometry motility classification. HRM and Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0) were used as the reference standard.
A total of 224 patients (mean age, 52 ± 18 years; 51% female) were included; 112 (50%) had achalasia or conclusive EGJ outflow obstruction (EGJOO) according to HRM and CCv4.0. None of 63 patients with CARS score 0 to 1 and normal EGJ opening on FLIP panometry had achalasia/conclusive EGJOO (100% negative predictive value); 65 of 65 patients with CARS score ≥4 and FLIP panometry classifications of nonspastic obstruction (n = 65) had achalasia or conclusive EGJOO, which was nonspastic in 63 (97% positive predictive value). Of the 96 of 224 (43%) patients with other CARS/FLIP combinations, 47 (49%) had achalasia or conclusive EGJOO.
An approach using endoscopy (CARS score) and FLIP panometry (endoscopy with FLIP panometry [mechanics, anatomy, physiology]) identified actionable esophageal motility disorders at the point-of-care endoscopy encounter. While additional validation is planned, this approach offers a well tolerated method that addresses limitations of HRM. Applied to the index endoscopic encounter, this approach could expedite management, reducing need for HRM in some patients versus triaging toward additional testing in others.
上消化道内镜检查和功能性管腔成像探头(FLIP)测压法为在镇静状态下的内镜检查过程中诊断食管动力障碍提供了一种互补的方法。本研究旨在评估一种结合内镜动力评分(CARS)和FLIP测压法来诊断食管动力障碍的方法。
纳入完成了上消化道内镜检查、FLIP检查和高分辨率测压(HRM)的成年患者。回顾内镜视频以确定CARS评分。应用食管胃交界(EGJ)开口和收缩特性得出FLIP测压法的动力分类。HRM和芝加哥分类第4版(CCv4.0)用作参考标准。
共纳入224例患者(平均年龄52±18岁;51%为女性);根据HRM和CCv4.0,112例(50%)患有贲门失弛缓症或明确的EGJ流出道梗阻(EGJOO)。63例CARS评分为0至1且FLIP测压法显示EGJ开口正常的患者中无一例患有贲门失弛缓症/明确的EGJOO(阴性预测值100%);65例CARS评分≥4且FLIP测压法分类为非痉挛性梗阻的患者(n = 65)中有65例患有贲门失弛缓症或明确的EGJOO,其中63例为非痉挛性(阳性预测值97%)。在224例(43%)具有其他CARS/FLIP组合的患者中,96例中有47例(49%)患有贲门失弛缓症或明确的EGJOO。
一种使用内镜检查(CARS评分)和FLIP测压法(带FLIP测压法的内镜检查[力学、解剖学、生理学])的方法在即时内镜检查过程中识别出了可采取行动的食管动力障碍。虽然计划进行进一步验证,但这种方法提供了一种耐受性良好的方法,解决了HRM的局限性。应用于初次内镜检查时,这种方法可以加快管理,减少一些患者对HRM的需求,而对另一些患者则分流至进一步检查。