De Matteis Carlo, Novielli Fabio, Di Buduo Ersilia, Arconzo Maria, Gadaleta Raffaella Maria, Cariello Marica, Moschetta Antonio, Crudele Lucilla
Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare N. 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
INBB National Institute for Biostructure and Biosystems, Via Dei Carpegna, 19 - 00165, Roma, Italia.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9136. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93141-y.
The Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP), calculated by log (Triglycerides/HDL-C), has been proposed as a marker of atherogenic and cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) share some pathogenic features and may be considered clinical manifestations of Metabolic Syndrome. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of increased AIP as a putative metabolic biomarker for MASLD. 1,496 individuals (49% males and 51% females) underwent clinical examination for Metabolic Syndrome at Internal Medicine Division "C. Frugoni" of University Hospital of Bari, Italy in the period between January 2016 and April 2024. Clinical history was recorded, and physical examination, anthropometric measures, biochemical assessment, and abdomen ultrasound were performed. In the overall population, AIP significantly correlated with fasting glycemia (FPG, r = 0.26, p < 0.0001), HbA1c (r = 0.20, p < 0.0001), LDL (r = 0.11, p < 0.0001) and total cholesterol (r = 0.09; p < 0.0001), and anthropometric measures of obesity BMI (r = 0.37, p < 0.0001) and Waist Circumference (r = 0.44; p < 0.001). We then investigated AIP values in patients with and without dysmetabolic conditions, finding that AIP significantly increased as steatosis worsened (p < 0.001). ROC curves identified an optimal cut-off of 0.31 for accurately diagnosing severe steatosis and AIP values above this cut-off discriminated patients with significantly increased (p < 0.0001) fasting glycemia, LDL, and waist circumference, and were strongly associated (p < 0.0001) with MASLD (LLR 85.3), type 2 diabetes (LLR 85.5), abdominal obesity (LLR 72.9), overweight (LLR 151.8), and systemic obesity (LLR 178.4). The risk for being diagnosed with such conditions was found to be even higher in the subpopulation of patients with severe liver steatosis. To validate our findings, we considered another cohort of patients with and without biopsy-proven liver steatosis (public dataset GSE89632), confirming that a significant increase (p < 0.001) in AIP values could be found in patients with liver steatosis compared to healthy controls. AIP can be considered a specific biomarker of fatty liver disease with high sensitivity for the diagnosis of the severe form of liver steatosis. Considering AIP in the evaluation of patients with liver steatosis may augment the accuracy for diagnosing metabolic impairment and MASLD.
血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)通过log(甘油三酯/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇)计算得出,已被提议作为动脉粥样硬化和心血管风险的标志物。动脉粥样硬化与代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病(MASLD)具有一些共同的致病特征,可被视为代谢综合征的临床表现。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨升高的AIP作为MASLD潜在代谢生物标志物的作用。2016年1月至2024年4月期间,1496名个体(49%为男性,51%为女性)在意大利巴里大学医院内科“C. Frugoni”接受了代谢综合征的临床检查。记录了临床病史,并进行了体格检查、人体测量、生化评估和腹部超声检查。在总体人群中,AIP与空腹血糖(FPG,r = 0.26,p < 0.0001)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c,r = 0.20,p < 0.0001)、低密度脂蛋白(r = 0.11,p < 0.0001)和总胆固醇(r = 0.09;p < 0.0001)以及肥胖的人体测量指标体重指数(BMI,r = 0.37,p < 0.0001)和腰围(r = 0.44;p < 0.001)显著相关。然后,我们调查了有和没有代谢异常情况患者的AIP值,发现随着脂肪变性加重,AIP显著升高(p < 0.001)。ROC曲线确定了准确诊断重度脂肪变性的最佳截断值为0.31,高于此截断值的AIP值可区分空腹血糖、低密度脂蛋白和腰围显著升高(p < 0.0001)的患者,并且与MASLD(似然比85.3)、2型糖尿病(似然比85.5)、腹型肥胖(似然比72.9)、超重(似然比151.8)和全身性肥胖(似然比178.4)密切相关(p < 0.0001)。在重度肝脂肪变性患者亚组中,被诊断为这些疾病的风险甚至更高。为了验证我们的发现,我们考虑了另一组有和没有经活检证实的肝脂肪变性的患者(公共数据集GSE89632),证实与健康对照相比,肝脂肪变性患者的AIP值显著升高(p < 0.001)。AIP可被视为脂肪性肝病的特异性生物标志物,对重度肝脂肪变性的诊断具有高敏感性。在评估肝脂肪变性患者时考虑AIP可能会提高诊断代谢损害和MASLD的准确性。