Grycan Jerzy, Kołodziej Małgorzata, Bańkosz Ziemowit
Division of Sports Didactics, Wrocław University of Health and Sport Sciences, Wrocław, Poland.
Division of Biomechanics, Wrocław University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612, Wrocław, Poland.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9183. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94196-7.
The aim of the research was to determine the quantitative structure of winning systems of the world's leading women players in table tennis in the years 1970-2021. The study used the Wu Huanqin game analysis method. It consists of observing the game, counting the scoring actions within the three stages or situations of a rally: serve/attack', 'return/attack', and 'stalemate phase'. In total 165 women's matches were analysed. The type and size of the ball (celluloid vs. plastic and 38 mm vs. 40 mm diameter) were factors according to which three research periods had been distinguished. With the changes of the ball used an increase in the use of subsequent actions in the so-called stalemate phase can be seen. This is probably related to slowing down the game and reducing the use of spin rotation when playing a large, plastic ball. The number of points scored directly with the serve decreases in particular periods. However, the use of side-forehand-serves and forehand-hook-serves increases over time. Service returns are dominated by backhand returns. This may be related to the greater possibilities of using disguised and diverse techniques to receive the serve (e.g. push, so called "banana" flick or "strawberry" flick, topspin). An interesting observation also was the large number of scorings with repetitive techniques in stalemate phase (e.g. repetition of topspin forehand or block backhand).
该研究的目的是确定1970年至2021年间世界顶尖女子乒乓球运动员获胜体系的量化结构。该研究采用了吴焕琴比赛分析方法。它包括观察比赛,统计在一分球的三个阶段或情况中的得分动作:“发球/进攻”、“回球/进攻”和“相持阶段”。总共分析了165场女子比赛。球的类型和尺寸(赛璐珞球与塑料球,直径38毫米与40毫米)是区分三个研究时期的因素。随着所使用球的变化,可以看到在所谓的相持阶段后续动作的使用有所增加。这可能与比赛节奏放缓以及使用大的塑料球时旋转的减少有关。在特定时期,直接通过发球得分的数量有所减少。然而,侧上旋发球和正手勾手发球的使用随着时间的推移而增加。接发球以反手回球为主。这可能与使用隐蔽和多样的技术来接发球(例如推挡、所谓的“香蕉”式挑打或“草莓”式挑打、上旋球)的更大可能性有关。一个有趣的观察结果还在于相持阶段大量使用重复技术得分(例如正手上旋球或反手挡球的重复)。