Jo Jinhwan, Lee Sang Yoon, Kwon Woochan, Lee Seung-Jae, Lee Jong-Young, Lee Seung Hun, Shin Doosup, Kim Sang Min, Yun Kyeong Ho, Cho Jae Young, Kim Chan Joon, Ahn Hyo-Suk, Nam Chang-Wook, Yoon Hyuck-Jun, Park Yong Hwan, Lee Wang Soo, Choi Ki Hong, Park Taek Kyu, Yang Jeong Hoon, Choi Seung-Hyuk, Gwon Hyeon-Cheol, Song Young Bin, Hahn Joo-Yong, Lee Sang Yeub, Lee Joo Myung
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Samsung Medical Center (J.J., Sang Yoon Lee, K.H.C., T.K.P., J.H.Y., S.-H.C., H.-C.G., Y.B.S., J.-Y.H., J.M.L.), Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (W.K., S.-J.L., J.-Y.L.), Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar;18(3):e014952. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014952. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
Although patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) often have complex coronary artery lesions, it is not known whether intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves their prognosis. We sought to investigate the benefit of intravascular imaging-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions in patients with HBR.
This was a secondary analysis of the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) in which patients with complex coronary artery lesions undergoing PCI were enrolled at 20 sites in Korea from May 2018 through May 2021. Patients were randomized to receive intravascular imaging-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI and classified according to the presence of HBR. The primary end point was target vessel failure, which was a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization.
Of 1639 trial population, 478 patients met HBR criteria. There was no significant difference in the risk of the primary end point between HBR and non-HBR patients (11.8% versus 8.2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% CI, 0.72-1.54]; =0.790). However, patients with HBR were at higher risk for cardiac death or spontaneous target vessel-related myocardial infarction (adjusted HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.09-3.80]; =0.025), all-cause death (adjusted HR, 3.30 [95% CI, 1.93-5.62]; <0.001), and cardiac death (adjusted HR, 2.36 [95% CI, 1.10-5.09]; =0.028). Intravascular imaging-guided PCI showed a lower risk of the primary end point compared with angiography-guided PCI in both HBR patients (9.7% versus 15.8%; adjusted HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.31-1.02]; =0.060) and non-HBR patients (6.9% versus 10.8%; adjusted HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.43-0.99]; =0.045), without significant interaction ( for interaction=0.796).
Patients with HBR were associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events after complex PCI compared with those without HBR. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI showed a lower risk of the target vessel failure without significant interaction between treatment strategy and the presence of HBR in patients undergoing complex PCI.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03381872.
尽管高出血风险(HBR)患者常伴有复杂冠状动脉病变,但血管内成像引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是否能改善其预后尚不清楚。我们旨在研究血管内成像引导的PCI对HBR患者复杂冠状动脉病变的益处。
这是对RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI试验(复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后血管内成像引导与血管造影引导对临床结局的随机对照试验)的二次分析,该试验于2018年5月至2021年5月在韩国的20个地点招募了接受PCI的复杂冠状动脉病变患者。患者被随机分配接受血管内成像引导的PCI或血管造影引导的PCI,并根据是否存在HBR进行分类。主要终点是靶血管失败,它是心源性死亡、靶血管相关心肌梗死或临床驱动的靶血管血运重建的综合指标。
在1639名试验人群中,478名患者符合HBR标准。HBR患者和非HBR患者的主要终点风险无显著差异(11.8%对8.2%;调整后的危险比[HR],1.05[95%CI,0.72 - 1.54];P = 0.790)。然而,HBR患者的心源性死亡或自发性靶血管相关心肌梗死风险更高(调整后的HR,2.04[95%CI,1.09 - 3.80];P = 0.025),全因死亡风险更高(调整后的HR,3.30[95%CI,1.93 - 5.62];P < 0.001),心源性死亡风险更高(调整后的HR,2.36[95%CI,1.10 - 5.09];P = 0.028)。在HBR患者(9.7%对15.8%;调整后的HR,0.57[95%CI,0.31 - 1.02];P = 0.060)和非HBR患者(6.9%对10.8%;调整后的HR,0.65[95%CI,0.43 - 0.99];P = 0.045)中,血管内成像引导的PCI与血管造影引导的PCI相比,主要终点风险更低,且无显著交互作用(交互作用P = 0.796)。
与无HBR的患者相比, HBR患者在复杂PCI后发生不良心血管事件的风险增加。在接受复杂PCI的患者中,血管内成像引导的PCI显示靶血管失败风险更低,且治疗策略与HBR的存在之间无显著交互作用。