Lawrinenko Michael, Rhea Lee, Forshay Kenneth J, Lee Tony R, White Mark, Wilkin Richard T
Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA.
Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 919 Kerr Research Drive, Ada, OK, 74820, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Apr;380:124962. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124962. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
Protecting groundwater is a global challenge in modern agriculture. Nutrients from livestock detritus and manure have caused adverse effects on ecosystems and posed health risks associated with use of contaminated groundwater. Such occurred at a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) where failed manure containment and buried carcasses led to toxic concentrations of ammonium and nitrate in groundwater. Here we evaluate a two-step approach to remediate ammonium using pump-and-treat technology, and nitrate using a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) composed of locally sourced hay as a carbon source to drive denitrification. Long-term monitoring (10-year dataset) revealed that effective mitigation of total nitrogen was accomplished through several mechanisms. Ammonium initially developed in the PRB from mineralization of protein in the hay; however, groundwater conditions permitted the possibility of dissimilatory nitrate reduction. Total nitrogen mitigation is attributed to anaerobic ammonium oxidation and denitrification. The reducing environment induced by the PRB caused reduction of iron oxyhydroxides as evidenced by increased dissolved iron and manganese in groundwater. Increased total phosphorus and arsenic mobilization was also locally observed. Some monitoring wells contained high levels of ammonium released from buried detritus. While the PRB effectively removed nitrate, elevated total phosphorus in stream water exceeded recommended limits and placed surface water at continued risk for eutrophication even ten years after installation. Locally sourced carbon sources deployed in a PRB can effectively mitigate nitrogen contamination in groundwater; however, future applications of organic carbon systems should consider the possible mobilization of secondary contaminants including phosphorus, arsenic, iron, and manganese.
保护地下水是现代农业面临的一项全球性挑战。来自牲畜粪便和厩肥的养分已对生态系统造成不利影响,并带来了与使用受污染地下水相关的健康风险。这种情况发生在一个集约化动物饲养场(CAFO),粪便储存设施故障和掩埋的牲畜尸体导致地下水中铵和硝酸盐的浓度达到有毒水平。在此,我们评估了一种两步法修复方案,即使用抽提处理技术去除铵,使用由当地干草作为碳源组成的可渗透反应屏障(PRB)来驱动反硝化作用去除硝酸盐。长期监测(10年数据集)表明,通过多种机制实现了对总氮的有效缓解。铵最初在PRB中通过干草中蛋白质的矿化作用产生;然而,地下水条件使得异化硝酸盐还原成为可能。总氮的缓解归因于厌氧氨氧化和反硝化作用。PRB诱导的还原环境导致羟基氧化铁还原,地下水中溶解的铁和锰增加证明了这一点。在局部地区还观察到总磷和砷的迁移增加。一些监测井含有从掩埋的粪便中释放的高浓度铵。虽然PRB有效地去除了硝酸盐,但即使在安装十年后,河水中总磷的升高仍超过了推荐限值,使地表水仍面临富营养化的持续风险。部署在PRB中的本地碳源可以有效缓解地下水中的氮污染;然而,有机碳系统的未来应用应考虑包括磷、砷、铁和锰在内的次生污染物的可能迁移。