Landron Thelma, Lopez-Persem Alizée, Domenech Philippe, Lehongre Katia, Navarro Vincent, Rheims Sylvain, Kahane Philippe, Bastin Julien, Pessiglione Mathias
Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Sorbonne Université, Inserm UMR1127, CNRS UMR 7225, 75013 Paris, France.
Epilepsy Unit, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, 75013 Paris, France.
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 18;45(18). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1740-24.2025.
Some decisions, such as selecting a food item in a novel menu, are not based on rational norms, or on trained habits, but on subjective preferences. How the human brain makes these preference-based decisions is still debated in cognitive neuroscience. Classical models focus on the comparison mechanism that achieves the selection of the option with best expected value. Recent models suggest that estimates of option values are refined until reaching sufficient confidence in the considered choice. Neuroimaging studies in humans and electrophysiology studies in animals have gathered evidence that value and confidence estimates are both represented in medial and lateral regions of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Here, we took advantage of electrodes implanted within the OFC of human patients with pharmaco-resistant epilepsy (14 women, 12 men) to investigate whether value and confidence estimates can be dissociated in electrophysiology activity recorded during preference-based binary decisions. The overall value (liking ratings summed over options) and choice confidence (selection probability of the chosen option) were identified in low-frequency (4-8 Hz) OFC activity. These value and confidence signals were time-locked to the decision, showed opposite signs of correlation and were recorded in separate sites. This pattern of results is not consistent with the simulations of an attractor neural network model implementing a comparison of option values. However, it is compatible with the notion of a neural network generating sparse representations of option values and choice confidence estimates, based on which decisions can be made. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is known to play a critical role in decisions based on subjective preferences, such as choosing between food items in a menu. However, the information provided by the human OFC has remained elusive, due to limitations of neuroimaging techniques. Here, taking advantage of electrodes implanted in patients for clinical purposes, we present a rare dataset of electrophysiological activity recorded during preference-based decisions. Our analyses suggest that the OFC signals two distinct constructs on which decisions could be based: the subjective values of available options and the confidence in the intended choice.
有些决策,比如在一份新颖的菜单中选择食物,并非基于理性规范或训练有素的习惯,而是基于主观偏好。人类大脑如何做出这些基于偏好的决策,在认知神经科学领域仍存在争议。经典模型聚焦于实现具有最佳预期价值选项选择的比较机制。近期模型表明,选项价值的估计会不断细化,直至对所考虑的选择有足够的信心。对人类的神经影像学研究和对动物的电生理学研究已收集到证据,表明价值估计和信心估计都在眶额皮质(OFC)的内侧和外侧区域有所体现。在此,我们利用植入耐药性癫痫患者眶额皮质内的电极(14名女性,12名男性),来研究在基于偏好的二元决策过程中记录的电生理活动里,价值估计和信心估计是否能够区分开来。在低频(4 - 8赫兹)的眶额皮质活动中识别出了总体价值(各选项喜好评分总和)和选择信心(所选选项的选择概率)。这些价值和信心信号与决策在时间上锁定,显示出相反的相关迹象,且记录于不同部位。这种结果模式与实施选项价值比较的吸引子神经网络模型的模拟结果不一致。然而,它与一个神经网络的概念相符,该网络生成选项价值和选择信心估计的稀疏表征,并据此做出决策。众所周知,眶额皮质(OFC)在基于主观偏好的决策中起着关键作用,比如在菜单中的食物项目之间进行选择。然而,由于神经影像学技术的局限性,人类眶额皮质所提供的信息一直难以捉摸。在此,利用因临床目的植入患者体内的电极,我们展示了一个在基于偏好的决策过程中记录的罕见电生理活动数据集。我们的分析表明,眶额皮质发出两种不同的构建信号,决策可能基于这两种信号:可用选项的主观价值和对预期选择的信心。