Chongwilaikasaem Sukampon, Ayaragarnchanakul Eva, Kongcharoen Chaleampong, Pongajarn Chalermpat, Rehm Jürgen
Faculty of Economics, Prince of Songkla University, 15 Kanjanavanich Rd., Songkhla, 90110, Thailand.
Faculty of Economics, Thammasat University, 2 Phra Chan Alley, Phra Borom Maha Ratchawang, Phra Nakhon, Bangkok, 10200, Thailand.
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s10754-025-09395-6.
Alcohol deregulation has recently been a topic of debate in Thailand, with policymakers weighing the potential economic benefits against public health harms and social concerns. This study estimates the impact on alcohol consumption levels in Thailand if barriers to producing alcoholic beverages are removed. Since the deregulation has not yet been implemented, we employed a randomized survey design for a Volumetric Choice Experiment administered to 1220 individuals, both drinkers and non-drinkers. The "treatment" group (with deregulation) was compared to the "control" group (without deregulation). While respondents in the control group were presented with existing drinks supplied by large producers, respondents in the treatment group were presented with new drinks supplied by small local producers alongside the existing options. Deregulation would introduce a wider variety of drinks, including cheaper local craft beer, white spirits, and brown spirits. Various scenarios of product availability and pricing were validated by experts. Our analysis reveals a 19.93% rise in total annual alcohol per capita consumption (APC), with a statistically significant difference between the treatment and control groups at a 90% confidence level. Further exploration into cross-price elasticities of demand suggests new drinks would partly substitute current options. Policymakers should carefully consider the public health implications, including increased risks of alcohol-related harms, as well as potential economic benefits from market liberalization. Regulatory measures, such as taxation, age restrictions, and public awareness campaigns, may be necessary to mitigate the projected consumption increase and associated social costs.
酒精管制放松最近在泰国一直是一个辩论话题,政策制定者在权衡潜在的经济效益与公共健康危害及社会关切。本研究估计了如果去除酒精饮料生产障碍对泰国酒精消费水平的影响。由于管制放松尚未实施,我们对1220名饮酒者和非饮酒者进行了一项容积选择实验的随机调查设计。将“处理”组(有管制放松)与“对照组”(无管制放松)进行比较。对照组的受访者看到的是大型生产商提供的现有饮料,而处理组的受访者看到的是当地小型生产商提供的新饮料以及现有的选择。管制放松将引入更多种类的饮料,包括更便宜的当地精酿啤酒、白酒和威士忌。产品可得性和定价的各种情景由专家进行了验证。我们的分析显示人均年酒精总消费量(APC)上升了19.93%,在90%的置信水平下,处理组和对照组之间存在统计学上的显著差异。对需求交叉价格弹性的进一步探索表明新饮料将部分替代现有选择。政策制定者应仔细考虑公共健康影响,包括与酒精相关危害风险的增加,以及市场自由化的潜在经济效益。可能需要采取税收、年龄限制和公众宣传活动等监管措施来减轻预计的消费增长及相关社会成本。