• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水门汀类型对正畸带环与氧化锆全冠粘结强度的影响。

Influence of cement type on the bond strength of orthodontic bands to zirconia crowns.

作者信息

Alharbi Fahad

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05615-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05615-0
PMID:40102836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11917105/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the retentive strength and residual cement of orthodontic bands bonded to zirconia crowns using four cementation protocols: Glass-ionomer cement (GIC), Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), Transbond Plus Light Cure Band Adhesive without silane, and Transbond Plus with silane primer application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty zirconia crowns were divided into four groups (15 each) and cemented with the respective cements. Each crown was mounted on a resin-based tooth-like structure and secured to a universal testing machine. Orthodontic bands were adapted to the crowns, and forces were applied to measure retentive strength. After debonding, the remaining cement was assessed using the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Specimens underwent thermocycling (5,000 cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C) to simulate oral conditions.

RESULTS

The mean retentive strength was 1.23 MPa. Group 4 (Transbond Plus with silane) exhibited the highest strength (1.44 MPa), while group 1 (GIC) demonstrated the lowest (0.85 MPa). Cementation protocol significantly influenced retentive strength, with groups 2 (RMGIC) and 4 showing superior results to groups 1 and 3 (Transbond Plus without silane).

CONCLUSION

The cement type and protocol employed significantly affect the shear-peel bond strength of orthodontic bands cemented to zirconia crowns. RMGIC and Transbond Plus, especially with silane, provide superior retention compared to GIC.

摘要

背景

本研究使用四种粘结方案评估了粘结在氧化锆冠上的正畸带环的固位强度和剩余粘结剂:玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)、未使用硅烷的Transbond Plus光固化带环粘结剂以及使用硅烷底漆的Transbond Plus。

材料与方法

将60个氧化锆冠分为四组(每组15个),并用相应的粘结剂进行粘结。每个冠安装在树脂基牙齿样结构上,并固定到万能试验机上。将正畸带环适配到冠上,并施加力以测量固位强度。脱粘后,使用粘结剂残留指数(ARI)评估剩余的粘结剂。对标本进行热循环(在5°C和55°C之间循环5000次)以模拟口腔条件。

结果

平均固位强度为1.23MPa。第4组(使用硅烷的Transbond Plus)表现出最高强度(1.44MPa),而第1组(GIC)表现出最低强度(0.85MPa)。粘结方案对固位强度有显著影响,第2组(RMGIC)和第4组的结果优于第1组和第3组(未使用硅烷的Transbond Plus)。

结论

所使用的粘结剂类型和方案显著影响粘结在氧化锆冠上的正畸带环的剪切-剥离粘结强度。与GIC相比,RMGIC和Transbond Plus,尤其是使用硅烷时,具有更好的固位效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9985/11917105/51769b1f7901/12903_2025_5615_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9985/11917105/8487faa843fc/12903_2025_5615_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9985/11917105/51769b1f7901/12903_2025_5615_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9985/11917105/8487faa843fc/12903_2025_5615_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9985/11917105/51769b1f7901/12903_2025_5615_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of cement type on the bond strength of orthodontic bands to zirconia crowns.水门汀类型对正畸带环与氧化锆全冠粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 18;25(1):397. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05615-0.
2
Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.用于带环粘结的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、改良型复合树脂或传统玻璃离子水门汀?——一项体外评估
Eur J Orthod. 2003 Dec;25(6):609-14. doi: 10.1093/ejo/25.6.609.
3
Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns.热循环(有或没有1年水储存)对氧化锆全冠粘结水门汀固位强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jun;113(6):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
4
Effect of Sandblasting and Type of Cement on the Bond Strength of Molar Bands on Stainless Steel Crowns.喷砂处理及粘结剂类型对不锈钢冠上磨牙带粘结强度的影响
J Dent Child (Chic). 2015 May-Aug;82(2):64-9.
5
The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.固位沟、喷砂处理及黏固剂类型对乳第二磨牙不锈钢全冠固位强度的影响——一项体外对比研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Jan-Mar;30(1):19-26. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.95570.
6
In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.使用不同粘结剂的氧化锆陶瓷冠的体外固位强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011.
7
Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.使用标准化牙冠预备,牙本质脱敏剂和粘结剂对全冠固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Apr;83(4):459-65. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70042-4.
8
Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.使用三种不同类型的粘结剂对氧化锆陶瓷冠进行固位
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Aug;96(2):104-14. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.06.001.
9
An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.使用三种不同粘结水门汀对镍铬合金铸造修复体的固位和边缘密合性的评估:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;23(1):20-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.99032.
10
Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.内间隙宽度和粘结剂类型对拉伸试验中氧化锆全冠固位力的影响。
J Dent. 2012 Oct;40(10):866-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to three-dimensionally-printed and milled materials after surface treatment and artificial aging.表面处理和人工老化后,正畸托槽与三维打印和铣削材料粘结的剪切粘结强度的比较评估。
Korean J Orthod. 2023 Jan 25;53(1):45-53. doi: 10.4041/kjod22.098. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
2
RoBDEMAT: A risk of bias tool and guideline to support reporting of pre-clinical dental materials research and assessment of systematic reviews.RoBDEMAT:一种偏倚风险工具和指南,用于支持报告临床前牙科材料研究,并评估系统评价。
J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104350. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104350. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
Evaluation of microleakage for three types of light cure orthodontic band cement.
三种光固化正畸带环粘结剂微渗漏的评估
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022 May-Jun;12(3):352-357. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.04.004. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
4
Effect of surface treatments and flash-free adhesive on the shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to CAD/CAM provisional materials.表面处理和无闪光粘合剂对陶瓷正畸托槽与CAD/CAM临时材料之间剪切粘结强度的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):481-492. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04022-3. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
5
Evaluation of Shear Peel Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Cements Used for Fixed Space Maintainer Cementation: An Study.用于固定间隙保持器粘结的不同粘结水门汀的剪切剥离粘结强度评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):175-179. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1932.
6
European Society of Endodontology position statement: The restoration of root filled teeth.欧洲牙髓病学会立场声明:根管治疗后的牙齿修复。
Int Endod J. 2021 Nov;54(11):1974-1981. doi: 10.1111/iej.13607. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
7
Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Temporary Crowns: In Vitro Effects of Surface Treatment.正畸托槽与临时冠的粘结强度:表面处理的体外效应
Int J Dent. 2021 Jun 29;2021:9999933. doi: 10.1155/2021/9999933. eCollection 2021.
8
Shear bond strength evaluation of metallic brackets bonded to a CAD/CAM PMMA material compared to traditional prosthetic temporary materials: an in vitro study.与传统修复临时材料相比,金属托槽粘结于CAD/CAM聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯材料的剪切粘结强度评估:一项体外研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 May;25(3):31-38. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.3.031-038.oar. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
9
Orthodontic Bonding: Review of the Literature.正畸粘结:文献综述
Int J Dent. 2020 Jul 14;2020:8874909. doi: 10.1155/2020/8874909. eCollection 2020.
10
Orthodontic brackets friction changes after clinical use: A systematic review.正畸托槽临床使用后的摩擦力变化:一项系统评价。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 May 1;11(5):e482-e490. doi: 10.4317/jced.55676. eCollection 2019 May.