文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

半剂量与三分之一剂量光动力疗法治疗慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的疗效比较:一项回顾性研究

Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Farvardin Mohsen, Eghtedari Dorna, Shahmohammadi Maryam, Johari Mohammadkarim

机构信息

Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025 Mar 18;11(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40942-025-00657-6.


DOI:10.1186/s40942-025-00657-6
PMID:40102960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11921750/
Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 72 eyes from 72 patients with chronic CSC treated with either one-third-dose (2 mg/m²) or half-dose (3 mg/m²) PDT. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), subretinal fluid (SRF) thickness, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was used to guide laser application. Treatment outcomes, including SRF resolution, BCVA gain, and recurrence rates, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: At 12 months, complete SRF resolution was achieved in 40 eyes (78.4%) in the half-dose group and 15 eyes (71.4%) in the one-third-dose group. The recurrence rate of SRF was significantly higher in the one-third-dose group (20%) compared to the half-dose group (7.5%) (P =.015). BCVA improved significantly in both groups, with mean increases from 72.4 ± 3.9 to 77.1 ± 5.6 letters in the one-third-dose group and from 74.4 ± 4.2 to 80.2 ± 2.19 letters in the half-dose group. The proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 10-letter gain was higher in the half-dose group (52%) compared to the one-third-dose group (28.5%, P =.001). Both groups exhibited significant reductions in CRT, SRF thickness, and SFCT (P <.001), with no significant intergroup differences. Baseline CRT and fluorescein leakage patterns influenced treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: Both one-third-dose and half-dose PDT effectively improved visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with chronic CSC. However, half-dose PDT demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving SRF resolution and greater visual acuity gains with a lower recurrence rate. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

摘要

目的:比较半剂量和三分之一剂量维替泊芬光动力疗法(PDT)治疗慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSC)患者的疗效和安全性。 方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了72例慢性CSC患者的72只眼,这些患者接受了三分之一剂量(2mg/m²)或半剂量(3mg/m²)的PDT治疗。在基线、3个月和12个月时评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、视网膜中央厚度(CRT)、视网膜下液(SRF)厚度、黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度(SFCT)以及光学相干断层扫描(OCT)特征。使用荧光素血管造影(FA)来指导激光应用。比较两组的治疗结果,包括SRF消退、BCVA提高和复发率。 结果:在12个月时,半剂量组40只眼(78.4%)实现了SRF完全消退,三分之一剂量组15只眼(71.4%)实现了SRF完全消退。三分之一剂量组SRF的复发率(20%)显著高于半剂量组(7.5%)(P = 0.015)。两组的BCVA均有显著改善,三分之一剂量组平均从72.4±3.9提高到77.1±5.6个字母,半剂量组平均从74.4±4.2提高到80.2±2.19个字母。半剂量组实现≥10个字母提高的患者比例(52%)高于三分之一剂量组(28.5%,P = 0.001)。两组的CRT、SRF厚度和SFCT均显著降低(P < 0.001),组间无显著差异。基线CRT和荧光素渗漏模式影响治疗反应。 结论:三分之一剂量和半剂量的PDT均能有效改善慢性CSC患者的视力和解剖学结果。然而,半剂量PDT在实现SRF消退和提高视力方面显示出更好的疗效,且复发率更低。 临床试验编号:不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fad/11921750/06572ef8d854/40942_2025_657_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fad/11921750/5a85be936832/40942_2025_657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fad/11921750/91cd32f7ab96/40942_2025_657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fad/11921750/06572ef8d854/40942_2025_657_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fad/11921750/5a85be936832/40942_2025_657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fad/11921750/91cd32f7ab96/40942_2025_657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fad/11921750/06572ef8d854/40942_2025_657_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study.

Int J Retina Vitreous. 2025-3-18

[2]
Comparison between the outcomes of fluorescein angiography-guided and indocyanine green angiography-guided half-time photodynamic therapy for central serous chorioretinopathy.

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020-9

[3]
One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy.

BMC Ophthalmol. 2021-1-12

[4]
Clinical research on one-third dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy in the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018-1

[5]
Visual and anatomical evaluation of navigated subthreshold micropulse laser versus photodynamic therapy in managing chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025-2

[6]
Clinical characteristics of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy patients with insufficient response to reduced-settings photodynamic therapy.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018-8

[7]
Subthreshold Micropulse Treatment Laser versus Half-Dose Photo Dynamic Therapy for the Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy with Parafoveal or Subfoveal Leakage STML versus PDT for Treatment of Chronic CSC.

J Ophthalmol. 2022-6-30

[8]
Half-dose photodynamic therapy followed by diode micropulse laser therapy as treatment for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: evaluation of a prospective treatment protocol.

Acta Ophthalmol. 2016-3

[9]
COMPARISON OF PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY USING HALF-DOSE OF VERTEPORFIN OR HALF-FLUENCE OF LASER LIGHT FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC CENTRAL SEROUS CHORIORETINOPATHY.

Retina. 2017-2

[10]
Comparison of half-dose versus half-fluence versus standard photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021-3

本文引用的文献

[1]
Perspectives and Update on the Global Shortage of Verteporfin (Visudyne).

Ophthalmol Ther. 2024-7

[2]
Central serous chorioretinopathy: An evidence-based treatment guideline.

Prog Retin Eye Res. 2024-7

[3]
One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy.

BMC Ophthalmol. 2021-1-12

[4]
Comparison of half-dose versus half-fluence versus standard photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021-3

[5]
Efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser compared with threshold conventional laser in central serous chorioretinopathy.

Eye (Lond). 2020-9

[6]
A 50% vs 30% dose of verteporfin (photodynamic therapy) for acute central serous chorioretinopathy: one-year results of a randomized clinical trial.

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015-3

[7]
Central serous chorioretinopathy: update on pathophysiology and treatment.

Surv Ophthalmol. 2013

[8]
Long-term chorioretinal changes after photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013-2-7

[9]
Half-dose vs one-third-dose photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Eye (Lond). 2012-5

[10]
Detection of morphologic alterations by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography before and after half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Retina. 2011-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索