Tang Xiu-Ping, Tang Zhi-Jin, Fan Hao-Bo, Zou Yun-Chun
Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Clinical College of North Sichuan Medical College (Nanchong Central Hospital), Nanchong 637000, Sichuan Province, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining 629000, Sichuan Province, China.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 18;18(3):390-397. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.03.03. eCollection 2025.
To compare the effects of manipulating light levels versus manipulating the spectral content of short wavelengths (blue light) of ambient lighting on refractive development in young rabbits.
A total of 32 healthy 3-week-old rabbits were randomly assigned to one of the four groups with 8 in each group for 12wk: Control group (NC) under low blue light (output ratio of blue light 1.8%) at low illuminance (341 lx), HI group under low blue light (output ratio of blue light 1.6%) at high illuminance (5057 lx), simulating natural light (S-NL) group under high blue light (output ratio of blue light 4.9%) at high illuminance (5052 lx), and MB group under high blue light (output ratio of blue light 5.2%) at low illuminance (342 lx). The lighting in each group were provided by light emitting diode (LED) lamps emitting visible light (range 380-780 nm) in addition to (or not) LED lamps only emitting short wavelength (range 380-500 nm). Refraction, axial length, and corneal curvature radius were assessed by retinoscopy, ultrasonography and keratometry, respectively. Average data of both eyes for each animal were used as single values and compared among groups.
During the 12-week intervention, all animals had an emmetropization period. The decrease of refraction in rabbits in HI group was similar to S-NL group, both slower than that of NC group (<0.001). At the 12 week, the refraction (3.000±0.267 D) and vitreous cavity depth (7.421±0.168 mm) of S-NL was similar to HI group (3.250±0.267 D, 7.264±0.256 mm), significantly different from NC group (1.937±0.291 D, 7.825±0.313 mm; <0.001 for both). High blue light at low illuminance had little effect on refraction change. At the end of intervention, the difference of refraction (2.219±0.281 D) and vitreous cavity depth (7.785±0.229 mm) in MB group were not statistically significant (=0.311, =0.749) compared with NC group. The other components were less affected by lighting conditions (>0.05).
The light levels per se but not the rich in spectral content of short wavelengths determine the inhibitory effect of ambient lighting on myopia development in rabbits.
比较调节环境光照强度与调节环境光照短波长(蓝光)光谱成分对幼兔屈光发育的影响。
将32只3周龄健康家兔随机分为4组,每组8只,干预12周。对照组(NC)在低光照强度(341勒克斯)下接受低蓝光(蓝光输出比例1.8%);高光照强度组(HI)在高光照强度(5057勒克斯)下接受低蓝光(蓝光输出比例1.6%);模拟自然光组(S-NL)在高光照强度(5052勒克斯)下接受高蓝光(蓝光输出比例4.9%);低光照强度高蓝光组(MB)在低光照强度(342勒克斯)下接受高蓝光(蓝光输出比例5.2%)。每组的光照由发射可见光(波长范围380 - 780纳米)的发光二极管(LED)灯提供,部分组还(或不)配备仅发射短波长(波长范围380 - 500纳米)的LED灯。分别通过视网膜检影法、超声检查和角膜曲率计评估屈光、眼轴长度和角膜曲率半径。将每只动物双眼的平均数据作为单个值进行组间比较。
在12周的干预期间,所有动物都有正视化过程。HI组家兔的屈光度下降情况与S-NL组相似,均慢于NC组(<0.001)。在第12周时,S-NL组的屈光度(3.000±0.267 D)和玻璃体腔深度(7.421±0.168毫米)与HI组(3.250±0.267 D,7.264±0.256毫米)相似,与NC组(1.937±0.291 D,7.825±0.313毫米;两者均<0.001)有显著差异。低光照强度下的高蓝光对屈光度变化影响较小。干预结束时,MB组的屈光度(2.219±0.281 D)和玻璃体腔深度(7.785±0.229毫米)与NC组相比差异无统计学意义(=0.311,=0.749)。其他指标受光照条件影响较小(>0.05)。
环境光照对家兔近视发展的抑制作用取决于光照强度本身,而非短波长光谱成分的丰富程度。