• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过测量手指关节角度评估摄影测量软件3DF Zephyr构建的三维模型的可靠性:与传统测角仪的比较。

Evaluating the Reliability of Three-dimensional Models Constructed Photogrammetry Software 3DF Zephyr by Measuring Joint Angles of Fingers: A Comparison to a Conventional Goniometer.

作者信息

Miyake Keisuke

机构信息

Plastic Surgery, Saiseikai Matsuyama Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.

出版信息

J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Sep 8;3(1):34-38. doi: 10.53045/jprs.2022-0051. eCollection 2024 Jan 27.

DOI:10.53045/jprs.2022-0051
PMID:40104417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11913006/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Photogrammetry is a method of producing three-dimensional (3D) data from multiple photographs and videos. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of 3D hand models constructed using photogrammetry.

METHODS

The angles of the distal (DIP) and proximal (PIP) interphalangeal joints of the author's index finger were measured using a protractor goniometer. Five different blocks were used to stabilize the angles of the fingers. We collected 50 photographs and one video. Digital 3D models of the hand were constructed using 3DF Zephyr photogrammetry software. The angles of the DIP and PIP joints of the model were measured in virtual space. The angles obtained via the two methods were subjected to correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty values (40 joints of 20 fingers; goniometer/3D model) were obtained. The maximum value obtained was 84° and the minimum was 33°. The average time required to take the original photographs of the model was 3 minutes, and that for the videos was 51 seconds. The average time required to construct a 3D image was 12 minutes. The greatest difference between the methods was 9° and the mean difference was 0.2°. The intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) was 0.971.

CONCLUSIONS

A high level of agreement was found between these angles. A 3D hand model constructed using photogrammetry is reproducible.

摘要

目的

摄影测量法是一种从多张照片和视频中生成三维(3D)数据的方法。本研究的目的是评估使用摄影测量法构建的3D手部模型的可靠性。

方法

使用量角器测角仪测量作者食指的远端指间关节(DIP)和近端指间关节(PIP)的角度。使用五个不同的木块来固定手指的角度。我们收集了50张照片和一段视频。使用3DF Zephyr摄影测量软件构建手部的数字3D模型。在虚拟空间中测量模型的DIP和PIP关节的角度。对通过两种方法获得的角度进行相关性分析。

结果

获得了80个值(20根手指的40个关节;测角仪/3D模型)。获得的最大值为84°,最小值为33°。拍摄模型原始照片的平均时间为3分钟,拍摄视频的平均时间为51秒。构建3D图像的平均时间为12分钟。两种方法之间的最大差异为9°,平均差异为0.2°。组内相关系数(2,1)为0.971。

结论

发现这些角度之间具有高度一致性。使用摄影测量法构建的3D手部模型具有可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7c/11913006/580d49fc2dba/jprs-03-01-0034-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7c/11913006/3c13fa388782/jprs-03-01-0034-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7c/11913006/099557f50e08/jprs-03-01-0034-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7c/11913006/2753d52fc3ce/jprs-03-01-0034-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7c/11913006/580d49fc2dba/jprs-03-01-0034-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7c/11913006/3c13fa388782/jprs-03-01-0034-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7c/11913006/099557f50e08/jprs-03-01-0034-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7c/11913006/2753d52fc3ce/jprs-03-01-0034-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc7c/11913006/580d49fc2dba/jprs-03-01-0034-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Reliability of Three-dimensional Models Constructed Photogrammetry Software 3DF Zephyr by Measuring Joint Angles of Fingers: A Comparison to a Conventional Goniometer.通过测量手指关节角度评估摄影测量软件3DF Zephyr构建的三维模型的可靠性:与传统测角仪的比较。
J Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Sep 8;3(1):34-38. doi: 10.53045/jprs.2022-0051. eCollection 2024 Jan 27.
2
A comparative evaluation of photogrammetry software programs and conventional impression techniques for the fabrication of nasal maxillofacial prostheses.用于制作鼻颌面修复体的摄影测量软件程序与传统印模技术的比较评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul;134(1):268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.08.027. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
3
Virtual goniometric measurement of the forearm, wrist, and hand: A double-blind psychometric study of a digital goniometer.前臂、手腕和手部的虚拟测角测量:数字测角仪的双盲心理测量学研究。
J Hand Ther. 2025 Jan-Mar;38(1):103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
4
Evaluation of accuracy of photogrammetry with 3D scanning and conventional impression method for craniomaxillofacial defects using a software analysis.基于软件分析的 3D 扫描和传统印模法在颅颌面缺损中的精度评估。
Trials. 2022 Dec 27;23(1):1048. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07005-1.
5
Analysis of the reliability and reproducibility of goniometry compared to hand photogrammetry.与手部摄影测量法相比,角度测量法的可靠性和可重复性分析。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(3):139-49. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000300003.
6
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Digital Models Generated Using Photogrammetry.使用摄影测量法生成的数字模型的准确性评估。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 10;16(12):e75448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75448. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Minimal detectable difference of the finger and wrist range of motion: comparison of goniometry and 3D motion analysis.手指和手腕运动范围的最小可检测差异:关节角度测量法与 3D 运动分析的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jun 10;14(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1177-y.
8
Biomechanics and Pinch Force of the Index Finger Under Simulated Proximal Interphalangeal Arthrodesis.模拟近节指间关节融合时示指的生物力学与捏力
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Aug;42(8):658.e1-658.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 4.
9
Measurement accuracy of 3-Dimensional mapping technologies versus standard goniometry for angle assessment.三维映射技术与标准测角法在角度评估方面的测量准确性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):547-554. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
Photogrammetry as an alternative for acquiring digital dental models: A proof of concept.摄影测量学作为获取数字牙科模型的一种替代方法:概念验证。
Med Hypotheses. 2019 Jul;128:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-Enhanced 3D Models in Global Virtual Reality Case Conferences for Surgical Care in a Low-Income Country: Exploratory Study.低收入国家外科护理全球虚拟现实病例会议中的人工智能增强3D模型:探索性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 18;9:e69300. doi: 10.2196/69300.

本文引用的文献

1
American Sign Language Alphabet Recognition by Extracting Feature from Hand Pose Estimation.从手姿态估计中提取特征实现美国手语字母识别。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 31;21(17):5856. doi: 10.3390/s21175856.
2
Reliability of Stereophotogrammetry for Area Measurement in the Periocular Region.眼周区域面积测量的体视摄影测量法的可靠性。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;45(4):1601-1610. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-02091-5. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
3
A new method measurement for finger range of motion using a smartphone.一种使用智能手机测量手指活动范围的新方法。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020 Aug;54(4):207-214. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1755296. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
4
Measuring digit lengths with 3D digital stereophotogrammetry: A comparison across methods.使用 3D 数字体视摄影测量法测量指长:方法间的比较。
Am J Hum Biol. 2018 Jul;30(4):e23133. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23133. Epub 2018 May 9.
5
Reliability and Validity of Electro-Goniometric Range of Motion Measurements in Patients with Hand and Wrist Limitations.手部和腕部活动受限患者电子测角仪运动范围测量的可靠性和有效性
Open Orthop J. 2016 Jun 15;10:190-205. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010190. eCollection 2016.
6
Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.三维立体摄影测量法的准确性和可靠性:与直接人体测量法和二维摄影测量法的比较
Angle Orthod. 2016 May;86(3):487-94. doi: 10.2319/041415-244.1. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
7
Analysis of the reliability and reproducibility of goniometry compared to hand photogrammetry.与手部摄影测量法相比,角度测量法的可靠性和可重复性分析。
Acta Ortop Bras. 2012;20(3):139-49. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000300003.
8
A technique for motion capture of the finger using functional joint centres and the effect of calibration range of motion on its accuracy.一种使用功能关节中心进行手指运动捕捉的技术及其校准运动范围对其准确性的影响。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2012 May;226(5):360-7. doi: 10.1177/0954411912442133.
9
Goniometry of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints, Part I: a survey of instrumentation and placement preferences.近端和远端指间关节测角法,第一部分:仪器设备及放置偏好的调查
J Hand Ther. 2001 Jan-Mar;14(1):18-22. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80020-x.