Kurasawa Shingo, Horiuchi Ichitaro, Kajiyama Masashi, Kitahara Hiroe, Terashima Tsuyoshi, Horiuchi Akira
Department of Pediatrics Shinshu University School of Medicine Nagano Japan.
Digestive Disease Center Showa Inan General Hospital Nagano Japan.
DEN Open. 2025 Mar 18;5(1):e70099. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70099. eCollection 2025 Apr.
We compared the frequency of post-polypectomy bleeding or injured submucosal arteries between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps.
This was a prospective, randomized, single-center study. Patients who underwent CSP or EMR for 10-19-mm nonpedunculated polyps were enrolled in CSP and EMR groups, and we compared the patient and polyp characteristics, the number of clips used, clinical outcomes, adverse events, and pathological features of the resected polyps between these groups. The primary outcome was the presence of injured arteries in the submucosal layer of the resected polyps examined histologically. The secondary outcomes were immediate bleeding and delayed bleeding.
Fifty-three patients with 60 eligible polyps were enrolled. The numbers of polyps/patients were 30/26 in the CSP group and 30/27 in the EMR group. The patient and polyp characteristics were similar between the groups. The total number of hemostatic clips used for hemostasis or prophylactic clipping was significantly greater in the EMR group compared to the CSP group (78 vs. 10, < 0.001). The frequency of immediate bleeding after CSP was similar to that after EMR [6.7% (2/30) vs. 13% (4/30), = 0.39]. Delayed bleeding did not occur in either group. The presence of injured submucosal arteries after CSP was significantly less frequent than that after EMR: 10% (3/30) versus 67% (20/30), < 0.001.
In the resection of 10-19-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps, CSP may decrease post-polypectomy bleeding without prophylactic clipping compared to EMR as it results in fewer injured submucosal arteries. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05930041).
我们比较了冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)和内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)治疗无蒂结直肠息肉后息肉切除术后出血或黏膜下动脉损伤的发生率。
这是一项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究。对接受CSP或EMR治疗10 - 19毫米无蒂息肉的患者进行分组,分别纳入CSP组和EMR组,我们比较了两组患者及息肉的特征、使用夹子的数量、临床结局、不良事件以及切除息肉的病理特征。主要结局是通过组织学检查切除息肉黏膜下层中损伤动脉的存在情况。次要结局是即时出血和延迟出血。
共纳入53例患者的60枚符合条件的息肉。CSP组息肉/患者数量为30/26,EMR组为30/27。两组患者和息肉特征相似。与CSP组相比,EMR组用于止血或预防性夹闭的止血夹总数显著更多(78枚对10枚,<0.001)。CSP术后即时出血的发生率与EMR术后相似[6.7%(2/30)对13%(4/30),=0.39]。两组均未发生延迟出血。CSP术后黏膜下动脉损伤的发生率显著低于EMR:10%(3/30)对67%(20/30),<0.001。
在切除10 - 19毫米无蒂结直肠息肉时,与EMR相比,CSP可能减少息肉切除术后出血且无需预防性夹闭,因为其导致的黏膜下动脉损伤更少。www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT05930041)。