• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于10 - 19毫米的无蒂结直肠息肉,冷圈套息肉切除术后黏膜下动脉损伤明显少于内镜黏膜切除术后。

Injured submucosal arteries following cold snare polypectomy are significantly fewer versus those after endoscopic mucosal resection for 10-19-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps.

作者信息

Kurasawa Shingo, Horiuchi Ichitaro, Kajiyama Masashi, Kitahara Hiroe, Terashima Tsuyoshi, Horiuchi Akira

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics Shinshu University School of Medicine Nagano Japan.

Digestive Disease Center Showa Inan General Hospital Nagano Japan.

出版信息

DEN Open. 2025 Mar 18;5(1):e70099. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70099. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/deo2.70099
PMID:40104570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11915349/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We compared the frequency of post-polypectomy bleeding or injured submucosal arteries between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, single-center study. Patients who underwent CSP or EMR for 10-19-mm nonpedunculated polyps were enrolled in CSP and EMR groups, and we compared the patient and polyp characteristics, the number of clips used, clinical outcomes, adverse events, and pathological features of the resected polyps between these groups. The primary outcome was the presence of injured arteries in the submucosal layer of the resected polyps examined histologically. The secondary outcomes were immediate bleeding and delayed bleeding.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with 60 eligible polyps were enrolled. The numbers of polyps/patients were 30/26 in the CSP group and 30/27 in the EMR group. The patient and polyp characteristics were similar between the groups. The total number of hemostatic clips used for hemostasis or prophylactic clipping was significantly greater in the EMR group compared to the CSP group (78 vs. 10,  < 0.001). The frequency of immediate bleeding after CSP was similar to that after EMR [6.7% (2/30) vs. 13% (4/30),  = 0.39]. Delayed bleeding did not occur in either group. The presence of injured submucosal arteries after CSP was significantly less frequent than that after EMR: 10% (3/30) versus 67% (20/30),  < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

In the resection of 10-19-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps, CSP may decrease post-polypectomy bleeding without prophylactic clipping compared to EMR as it results in fewer injured submucosal arteries. www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05930041).

摘要

目的

我们比较了冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)和内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)治疗无蒂结直肠息肉后息肉切除术后出血或黏膜下动脉损伤的发生率。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究。对接受CSP或EMR治疗10 - 19毫米无蒂息肉的患者进行分组,分别纳入CSP组和EMR组,我们比较了两组患者及息肉的特征、使用夹子的数量、临床结局、不良事件以及切除息肉的病理特征。主要结局是通过组织学检查切除息肉黏膜下层中损伤动脉的存在情况。次要结局是即时出血和延迟出血。

结果

共纳入53例患者的60枚符合条件的息肉。CSP组息肉/患者数量为30/26,EMR组为30/27。两组患者和息肉特征相似。与CSP组相比,EMR组用于止血或预防性夹闭的止血夹总数显著更多(78枚对10枚,<0.001)。CSP术后即时出血的发生率与EMR术后相似[6.7%(2/30)对13%(4/30),=0.39]。两组均未发生延迟出血。CSP术后黏膜下动脉损伤的发生率显著低于EMR:10%(3/30)对67%(20/30),<0.001。

结论

在切除10 - 19毫米无蒂结直肠息肉时,与EMR相比,CSP可能减少息肉切除术后出血且无需预防性夹闭,因为其导致的黏膜下动脉损伤更少。www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT05930041)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5668/11915349/055b49e4c02d/DEO2-5-e70099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5668/11915349/01eab62bb0c4/DEO2-5-e70099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5668/11915349/055b49e4c02d/DEO2-5-e70099-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5668/11915349/01eab62bb0c4/DEO2-5-e70099-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5668/11915349/055b49e4c02d/DEO2-5-e70099-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Injured submucosal arteries following cold snare polypectomy are significantly fewer versus those after endoscopic mucosal resection for 10-19-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps.对于10 - 19毫米的无蒂结直肠息肉,冷圈套息肉切除术后黏膜下动脉损伤明显少于内镜黏膜切除术后。
DEN Open. 2025 Mar 18;5(1):e70099. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70099. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.冷圈套息肉切除术和冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗 10-19mm 无蒂结直肠息肉的有效性和安全性:一项多中心观察性队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2023 Jul;55(7):627-635. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-9539. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
Efficacy and safety of three different endoscopic methods in treatment of 6-20 mm colorectal polyps.三种不同内镜方法治疗 6-20mm 结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;55(3):362-370. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1732456. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.冷圈套息肉切除术与冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3789-3795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09875-1. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
5
Safety and efficacy of low-power pure-cut hot snare polypectomy for small nonpedunculated colorectal polyps compared with conventional resection methods: A propensity score matching analysis.低功率纯切割热圈套息肉切除术治疗小的无蒂结直肠息肉与传统切除方法相比的安全性和有效性:一项倾向评分匹配分析
DEN Open. 2024 May 7;5(1):e378. doi: 10.1002/deo2.378. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Is Submucosal Injection Helpful in Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps?黏膜下注射对小的结直肠息肉冷圈套息肉切除术有帮助吗?
Clin Endosc. 2021 May;54(3):397-403. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.226. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
7
Cold versus hot endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 6-10 mm: a randomized trial.6 - 10毫米无蒂结直肠息肉的冷圈套与热圈套内镜黏膜切除术:一项随机试验
Endoscopy. 2018 Apr;50(4):403-411. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118594. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
8
Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.结直肠息肉切除术和内镜黏膜切除术:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南-2024 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2024 Jul;56(7):516-545. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-3219. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
9
Comparison of cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection for 3-10-mm colorectal polyps in end-stage renal disease patients.比较冷圈套息肉切除术和内镜黏膜切除术治疗终末期肾病患者 3-10mm 结直肠息肉。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan-Feb;28(1):67-73. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_371_21.
10
Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy.抗凝治疗患者中小肠息肉切除术:冷圈套与传统息肉切除术的前瞻性随机比较。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of cold snare polypectomy and cold endoscopic mucosal resection for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm: a multicenter observational cohort study.冷圈套息肉切除术和冷内镜黏膜切除术治疗 10-19mm 无蒂结直肠息肉的有效性和安全性:一项多中心观察性队列研究。
Endoscopy. 2023 Jul;55(7):627-635. doi: 10.1055/a-2029-9539. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
Resection depth for small colorectal polyps comparing cold snare polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.比较冷圈套息肉切除术、热圈套息肉切除术和水下内镜黏膜切除术治疗小的结直肠息肉的切除深度。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E602-E608. doi: 10.1055/a-1785-8616. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Managing bleeding risk after cold snare polypectomy in patients receiving direct-acting oral anticoagulants.
接受直接口服抗凝剂治疗的患者冷圈套息肉切除术后出血风险的管理。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 May;95(5):969-974. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
4
A Comparison of Incomplete Resection Rate of Large and Small Colorectal Polyps by Cold Snare Polypectomy.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大小结直肠息肉的不完全切除率比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;20(5):1163-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.010. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
Endoscopic Recognition and Management Strategies for Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌恶性息肉的内镜识别与管理策略:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的建议
Gastroenterology. 2020 Nov;159(5):1916-1934.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.050. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Cold Snare Polypectomy Without Submucosal Injection for Large Sessile Serrated Lesions: A Prospective Study.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗无黏膜下注射的大型无蒂锯齿状病变的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性研究。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):e132-e138. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.053. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
Endoscopic Removal of Colorectal Lesions-Recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组关于内镜下切除结直肠病变的建议
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):1095-1129. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.018. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
8
Effectiveness and safety of a new regimen of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for same-day bowel cleansing in constipated patients.聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸新方案用于便秘患者当日肠道清洁的有效性和安全性
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2018 Oct-Dec;81(4):485-489.
9
Safety and Effectiveness of Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation in Outpatients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.护士管理下的异丙酚镇静在门诊胃肠道内镜检查中的安全性和有效性。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1098-1104.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.025. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
Wide-field piecemeal cold snare polypectomy of large sessile serrated polyps without a submucosal injection is safe.无黏膜下注射的大面积节段性冷圈套息肉切除术治疗大型无蒂锯齿状息肉是安全的。
Endoscopy. 2018 Mar;50(3):248-252. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121219. Epub 2017 Nov 23.