• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士管理下的异丙酚镇静在门诊胃肠道内镜检查中的安全性和有效性。

Safety and Effectiveness of Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation in Outpatients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, Komagane, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, Komagane, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1098-1104.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.025. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.025
PMID:29933097
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy are common outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures that frequently use sedation. We aimed to identify a protocol that combines safety with cost effectiveness.

METHODS

We collected data from consecutive outpatients (age, 20-98 y) who underwent diagnostic EGD (n = 117,661) or colonoscopy (n = 32,550) with propofol sedation from January 2006 through December 2016. Propofol was administered by a nurse via bolus injection using an age-adjusted standard protocol, up to a total of 200 mg. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of adverse events within 24 hours. Secondary outcome measures included rates of procedure success, respiratory depression, and other procedure-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The median dose of propofol administered for EGD was 77 mg (range, 20-160 mg) and for colonoscopy was 99 mg (range, 40-200 mg). Among patients undergoing EGD, those younger than 41 years required 1.5-fold more propofol than patients 61-80 years old. The only adverse event was the transient need for supplemental oxygen supply, required by 1950 patients (1.3%): 1689 undergoing EGD (1.4%) and 261 undergoing colonoscopy (0.8%). Patients were discharged after 60 minutes and at least 66,250 patients (44%) drove themselves from the hospital. None experienced a traffic accident within 24 hours after receiving propofol sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-administered propofol monosedation using an age-adjusted standard protocol up to a maximal of 200 mg is safe and practical for outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy.

摘要

背景与目的

食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)和结肠镜检查是常见的门诊胃肠道内镜检查程序,经常使用镇静剂。我们旨在确定一种将安全性与成本效益结合起来的方案。

方法

我们收集了 2006 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间接受丙泊酚镇静下诊断性 EGD(n=117661)或结肠镜检查(n=32550)的连续门诊患者(年龄 20-98 岁)的数据。护士通过使用年龄调整的标准方案给予丙泊酚推注,最高剂量为 200mg。主要观察指标为 24 小时内不良事件的发生情况。次要观察指标包括程序成功率、呼吸抑制和其他与程序相关的不良事件。

结果

EGD 中丙泊酚的中位剂量为 77mg(范围,20-160mg),结肠镜检查为 99mg(范围,40-200mg)。在接受 EGD 的患者中,年龄小于 41 岁的患者比 61-80 岁的患者需要多 1.5 倍的丙泊酚。唯一的不良事件是短暂需要补充氧气供应,有 1950 名患者(1.3%)需要:1689 名接受 EGD(1.4%)和 261 名接受结肠镜检查(0.8%)。患者在 60 分钟后出院,至少有 66250 名患者(44%)自行驾车离开医院。在接受丙泊酚镇静后 24 小时内,无人发生交通事故。

结论

使用年龄调整的标准方案给予最高 200mg 的丙泊酚单药镇静,由护士管理,用于门诊胃肠道内镜检查是安全且实用的。

相似文献

1
Safety and Effectiveness of Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation in Outpatients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.护士管理下的异丙酚镇静在门诊胃肠道内镜检查中的安全性和有效性。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1098-1104.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.025. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
2
Low-dose propofol sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy: results in 10,662 adults.低剂量丙泊酚镇静用于诊断性食管胃十二指肠镜检查:10662例成年人的结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;104(7):1650-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.250. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
3
Safety and effectiveness of propofol sedation during and after outpatient colonoscopy.异丙酚镇静在门诊结肠镜检查期间和之后的安全性和有效性。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 14;18(26):3420-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3420.
4
Which should go first during same-day bidirectional endosocopy with propofol sedation?在丙泊酚镇静下同日进行双向内镜检查时,应该先进行哪项检查?
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Oct;26(10):1559-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06786.x.
5
Same-day bidirectional endoscopy with nonanesthesiologist administration of propofol: safety and cost-effectiveness compared with separated exams.非麻醉医师管理下的同日双向内镜检查与分开检查的安全性和成本效益比较:使用异丙酚。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;26(3):301-8. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000026.
6
Prospective long-term assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient satisfaction for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy.上消化道内镜检查和结肠镜检查镇静相关不良事件及患者满意度的前瞻性长期评估。
Digestion. 2014;90(1):42-8. doi: 10.1159/000363567. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
7
[Safety of gastroenterologist-directed propofol administration for endoscopic procedures: 10-year experience in a private clinic in Lima, Peru].[在秘鲁利马一家私人诊所的10年经验:胃肠病学家指导下丙泊酚用于内镜检查的安全性]
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2018 Apr-Jun;38(2):157-163.
8
Safety of nonanesthetist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.门诊结肠镜检查和食管胃十二指肠镜检查中丙泊酚非麻醉医生镇静的安全性。
Endoscopy. 2003 Aug;35(8):679-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41518.
9
Safety and effectiveness of low-dose propofol sedation during and after esophagogastroduodenoscopy in child A and B cirrhotic patients.低剂量异丙酚镇静在儿童 A 型和 B 型肝硬化患者行食管胃十二指肠镜检查时和检查后的安全性和有效性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 May;58(5):1383-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2483-y. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
10
Computer-assisted personalized sedation for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: a comparative, multicenter randomized study.计算机辅助下的上消化道内镜和结肠镜检查的个体化镇静:一项对比、多中心随机研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Apr;73(4):765-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.031. Epub 2010 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Risk of Colonoscopy-related Bleeding in Patients With or Without Continued Treatment With an Antithrombotic Agent.接受或未接受抗血栓药物持续治疗的患者结肠镜检查相关出血风险
DEN Open. 2025 Jul 17;6(1):e70175. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70175. eCollection 2026 Apr.
2
Optimal sedation/anesthesia practices for painless gastroscopy in older adults: a randomized trial.老年人无痛胃镜检查的最佳镇静/麻醉方案:一项随机试验。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 22;12:1554937. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1554937. eCollection 2025.
3
The Incidence of Adverse Events in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation with Propofol Administered by Non-Anesthetists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
非麻醉医师使用丙泊酚进行程序性镇静的成年患者不良事件的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 14;15(10):1234. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101234.
4
Risk factors for adverse reactions to nurse-administered propofol during outpatient endoscopy: a cross-sectional study.门诊内镜检查期间护士给予丙泊酚不良反应的危险因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 May 6;25(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03012-2.
5
Nurse-Administered Sedation in Digestive Endoscopy: A Systematic Review.消化内镜检查中护士实施的镇静:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;15(8):1030. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15081030.
6
Injured submucosal arteries following cold snare polypectomy are significantly fewer versus those after endoscopic mucosal resection for 10-19-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps.对于10 - 19毫米的无蒂结直肠息肉,冷圈套息肉切除术后黏膜下动脉损伤明显少于内镜黏膜切除术后。
DEN Open. 2025 Mar 18;5(1):e70099. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70099. eCollection 2025 Apr.
7
The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate compared with propofol for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under monitored anesthesia care: A single-center randomized controlled clinical trial.在监护麻醉下,比较甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的有效性和安全性:一项单中心随机对照临床试验。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 24;10(19):e38349. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38349. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
8
Safe outpatient discharge after gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation and analgesia: a systematic literature review.胃肠内镜检查镇静镇痛后安全出院:一项系统文献综述
Ann Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep-Oct;37(5):499-508. doi: 10.20524/aog.2024.0899. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
9
Comparison of propofol-based sedation and midazolam sedation in pediatric bidirectional endoscopy conducted by pediatric gastroenterologists.儿科胃肠病学家进行的小儿双向内镜检查中丙泊酚镇静与咪达唑仑镇静的比较。
DEN Open. 2024 Jun 14;5(1):e391. doi: 10.1002/deo2.391. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Comparative analysis of the effect of electromyogram to bispectral index and 95% spectral edge frequency under remimazolam and propofol anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚麻醉下肌电图对脑电双频指数及95%频谱边缘频率影响的对比分析:一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 7;10:1128030. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1128030. eCollection 2023.