Luckett Rebecca, Ramogola-Masire Doreen, Moyo Sikhulile, Gompers Annika, Modest Anna, Moraka Natasha, Kashamba Thanolo, Tawe Leabaneng, Noubary Farzad, Kuhn Louise, Grover Surbhi, Dryden-Peterson Scott, Dreyer Greta, Makhema Joseph, Botha Matthys H, Hacker Michele R, Shapiro Roger
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Aug;170(2):882-892. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70074. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of HPV type restriction and cycle threshold (Ct)-limit setting to optimize detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with primary HPV testing.
Baseline cervical screening at time of entry into a prospective longitudinal cohort of women with and without HIV was conducted from February 2021 to July 2022 in Botswana. All women underwent HPV testing of 15 individual types using the AmpFire assay; all HPV-positive and a random subset of HPV negative had histopathology collected. Performance parameters of HPV type restriction groupings were calculated, and sensitivity by individual HPV type Ct-value limits were plotted.
Among 2964 women who underwent primary HPV screening, 1293 (43.6%) tested HPV-positive. Among women with HIV (WWH), HPV types 16/18/33 were associated with the greatest burden of CIN2+/CIN3+ (53%/56%). In WWH, grouping by HPV types separately reported in commercial assays (16/18/45) had low sensitivity (44% [CI: 36%-52%]) but high specificity (86% [CI: 84%-88%]) for CIN2+; 8-type HPV restriction (16/18/31/33/35/45/52/58) improved sensitivity (79% [CI: 72%-86%]) and maintained reasonable specificity (67% [CI: 65%-70%]) for CIN2+. Similar results were seen in women without HIV. Ct-limit setting for medium oncogenic HPV types (31,33,35,52,58) maintained a sensitivity of 72% in WWH while reducing over-detection of non-pathogenic HPV.
Eight-type HPV restriction and Ct-limit setting are promising strategies for improving the performance of primary HPV screening. A potential strategy to improve 8-type HPV restriction would be to treat all with HPV 16/18/45; treat HPV 31/33/35/52/58 if below the type-specific Ct limit and repeat HPV testing in 1-year for other positive HPV results.
本研究旨在评估人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)型别限制和循环阈值(Ct)设定对通过HPV初筛优化检测宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)的效果。
2021年2月至2022年7月在博茨瓦纳对进入有或无HIV感染的女性前瞻性纵向队列的女性进行基线宫颈筛查。所有女性均使用AmpFire检测法对15种HPV型别进行检测;所有HPV阳性者以及HPV阴性者的一个随机子集均进行了组织病理学检查。计算HPV型别限制分组的性能参数,并绘制各HPV型别Ct值限制下的敏感性曲线。
在2964名接受HPV初筛的女性中,1293名(43.6%)检测为HPV阳性。在感染HIV的女性(WWH)中,HPV 16/18/33型与CIN2 +/CIN3 +的最大负担相关(53%/56%)。在WWH中,按商业检测中单独报告的HPV型别(16/18/45)分组对CIN2 +的敏感性较低(44%[置信区间:36%-52%]),但特异性较高(86%[置信区间:84%-88%]);8型HPV限制(16/18/31/33/35/45/52/58)提高了对CIN2 +的敏感性(79%[置信区间:72%-86%]),并保持了合理的特异性(67%[置信区间:65%-70%])。在未感染HIV的女性中也观察到类似结果。中等致癌性HPV型别(31、33、35、52、58)的Ct设定在WWH中保持了72%的敏感性,同时减少了非致病性HPV的过度检测。
8型HPV限制和Ct设定是提高HPV初筛性能的有前景的策略。一种改进8型HPV限制的潜在策略是对所有HPV 16/18/45感染者进行治疗;如果HPV 31/33/35/52/58低于型别特异性Ct值限制则进行治疗,其他HPV阳性结果在1年后重复进行HPV检测。