Fukuokaya Wataru, Mori Keiichiro, Yanagisawa Takafumi, Urabe Fumihiko, Rajwa Pawel, Briganti Alberto, Shariat Shahrokh F, Matsubara Nobuaki, Kimura Takahiro, Hirakawa Akihiro
Department of Clinical Biostatistics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Cancer. 2025 Apr 1;131(7):e35819. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35819.
Investigation remains incomplete regarding potential variations in the effect of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, including apalutamide, based on baseline tumor burden in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC).
The authors analyzed individual participant-level data from 1052 patients with mCSPC who were randomized in the TITAN trial (apalutamide vs. placebo, both with androgen-deprivation therapy). Outcomes included radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), second PFS (PFS2), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, with and without restricted cubic splines, were used to determine the association between apalutamide benefit and bone metastasis count or visceral metastasis. Subgroup treatment effects were quantified based on inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs).
Analysis using restricted cubic splines indicated that apalutamide provided less benefit for PFS2 and OS in patients with fewer bone metastases. The authors also found evidence of a heterogeneous effect of apalutamide on PFS2 and OS between patients with two or less bone metastases and those with three or more bone metastases. In patients who had two or less bone metastases, there was no evidence of a benefit from apalutamide for radiographic PFS (HR, 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-1.22), PFS2 (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.66-2.12), or OS (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.60-1.83). No evidence of an association was noted between visceral metastasis and apalutamide benefit.
The addition of apalutamide to androgen-deprivation therapy may provide less benefit in patients with mCSPC who have fewer bone metastases. Counting baseline bone metastases may help identify optimal candidates for apalutamide treatment of mCSPC.
NCT02489318 PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In an analysis of individual participant data from a trial (the TITAN trial) in patients with metastatic (spreading) castration-sensitive prostate cancer, treatment intensification based on the addition new drugs to standard androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) was analyzed and compared with the effects in patients who received only standard ADT. Compared with ADT alone, the survival benefit of adding the new drug apalutamide to standard ADT varied according to the number of bone metastases, but no association was observed between the spread of cancer to soft tissues and organs and a survival benefit from adding apalutamide. The results indicate that counting the number of bone metastases may help identify which patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer are optimal candidates for treatment intensification with the addition of apalutamide to standard ADT.
关于雄激素受体通路抑制剂(包括阿帕他胺)对转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌(mCSPC)患者疗效的潜在差异,基于基线肿瘤负荷的研究仍不完整。
作者分析了1052例mCSPC患者的个体参与者水平数据,这些患者在TITAN试验中被随机分组(阿帕他胺与安慰剂,均联合雄激素剥夺治疗)。结局包括影像学无进展生存期(PFS)、第二次无进展生存期(PFS2)和总生存期(OS)。使用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型(有和没有受限立方样条)来确定阿帕他胺获益与骨转移计数或内脏转移之间的关联。基于治疗权重逆概率调整的风险比(HR)对亚组治疗效果进行量化。
使用受限立方样条的分析表明,对于骨转移较少的患者,阿帕他胺在PFS2和OS方面的获益较少。作者还发现,在骨转移数为两个或更少的患者与三个或更多的患者之间,阿帕他胺对PFS2和OS的影响存在异质性。在骨转移数为两个或更少的患者中,没有证据表明阿帕他胺对影像学PFS(HR,0.65;95%置信区间[CI],0.35 - 1.22)、PFS2(HR,1.18;95%CI,0.66 - 2.12)或OS(HR,1.05;95%CI,0.60 - 1.83)有获益。未观察到内脏转移与阿帕他胺获益之间存在关联的证据。
在雄激素剥夺治疗中添加阿帕他胺,对于骨转移较少的mCSPC患者可能获益较少。计算基线骨转移数可能有助于确定mCSPC患者接受阿帕他胺治疗的最佳候选者。
NCT02489318 通俗易懂的总结:在一项对转移性(扩散性)去势敏感性前列腺癌患者试验(TITAN试验)的个体参与者数据的分析中,分析了在标准雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)基础上加用新药的强化治疗,并与仅接受标准ADT的患者的效果进行比较。与单独使用ADT相比,在标准ADT基础上加用新药阿帕他胺的生存获益根据骨转移数量而有所不同,但未观察到癌症扩散至软组织和器官与加用阿帕他胺的生存获益之间存在关联。结果表明,计算骨转移数量可能有助于确定哪些转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌患者是在标准ADT基础上加用阿帕他胺进行强化治疗的最佳候选者。