影像学无进展生存期和临床无进展生存期作为转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌男性总生存期的潜在替代指标
Radiographic Progression-Free Survival and Clinical Progression-Free Survival as Potential Surrogates for Overall Survival in Men With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.
作者信息
Halabi Susan, Roy Akash, Rydzewska Larysa, Guo Siyuan, Godolphin Peter, Hussain Maha, Tangen Catherine, Thompson Ian, Xie Wanling, Carducci Michael A, Smith Matthew R, Morris Michael J, Gravis Gwenaelle, Dearnaley David P, Verhagen Paul, Goto Takayuki, James Nick, Buyse Marc E, Tierney Jayne F, Sweeney Christopher
机构信息
Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom.
出版信息
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 20;42(9):1044-1054. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01535. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
PURPOSE
Despite major increases in the longevity of men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), most men still die of prostate cancer. Phase III trials assessing new therapies in mHSPC with overall survival (OS) as the primary end point will take approximately a decade to complete. We investigated whether radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and clinical PFS (cPFS) are valid surrogates for OS in men with mHSPC and could potentially be used to expedite future phase III clinical trials.
METHODS
We obtained individual patient data (IPD) from 9 eligible randomized trials comparing treatment regimens (different androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] strategies or ADT plus docetaxel in the control or research arms) in mHSPC. rPFS was defined as the time from random assignment to radiographic progression or death from any cause whichever occurred first; cPFS was defined as the time from random assignment to the date of radiographic progression, symptoms, initiation of new treatment, or death, whichever occurred first. We implemented a two-stage meta-analytic validation model where conditions of patient-level and trial-level surrogacy had to be met. We then computed the surrogate threshold effect (STE).
RESULTS
IPD from 6,390 patients randomly assigned from 1994 to 2012 from 13 units were pooled for a stratified analysis. The median OS, rPFS, and cPFS were 4.3 (95% CI, 4.2 to 4.5), 2.4 (95% CI, 2.3 to 2.5), and 2.3 years (95% CI, 2.2 to 2.4), respectively. The STEs were 0.80 and 0.81 for rPFS and cPFS end points, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Both rPFS and cPFS appear to be promising surrogate end points for OS. The STE of 0.80 or higher makes it viable for either rPFS or cPFS to be used as the primary end point that is surrogate for OS in phase III mHSPC trials with testosterone suppression alone as the backbone therapy and would expedite trial conduct.
目的
尽管转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)男性患者的寿命大幅延长,但大多数男性仍死于前列腺癌。以总生存期(OS)作为主要终点评估mHSPC新疗法的III期试验大约需要十年时间才能完成。我们调查了影像学无进展生存期(rPFS)和临床无进展生存期(cPFS)是否是mHSPC男性患者OS的有效替代指标,并有可能用于加快未来的III期临床试验。
方法
我们从9项符合条件的随机试验中获取了个体患者数据(IPD),这些试验比较了mHSPC治疗方案(对照或研究组中不同的雄激素剥夺疗法[ADT]策略或ADT加多西他赛)。rPFS定义为从随机分组到影像学进展或任何原因导致的死亡(以先发生者为准)的时间;cPFS定义为从随机分组到影像学进展、出现症状、开始新治疗或死亡(以先发生者为准)的时间。我们实施了一个两阶段的荟萃分析验证模型,其中必须满足患者水平和试验水平替代指标的条件。然后我们计算了替代阈值效应(STE)。
结果
汇总了1994年至2012年从13个单位随机分配的6390例患者的IPD进行分层分析。中位OS、rPFS和cPFS分别为4.3年(95%CI,4.2至4.5)、2.4年(95%CI,2.3至2.5)和2.3年(95%CI,2.2至2.4)。rPFS和cPFS终点的STE分别为0.80和0.81。
结论
rPFS和cPFS似乎都是OS有前景的替代终点。0.80或更高的STE使得rPFS或cPFS都有可能用作III期mHSPC试验中OS的替代主要终点,试验以单独睾酮抑制作为主要治疗方法,这将加快试验进程。
相似文献
引用本文的文献
J Clin Oncol. 2024-8-20
Can Urol Assoc J. 2022-9
本文引用的文献
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022-1
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019-2-6