Kim Ryul, Kang Nyeonju, Lee Joon Ho, Lee Hanall, Lee Tae Lee, Ko Do Kyung, Lee Hajun, Byun Kyeongho, Park Kiwon, Lee Jee-Young, Jeon Beomseok
Department of Neurology, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Division of Sport Science, Sport Science Institute & Health Promotion Center, Incheon National University, Incheon, South Korea; Department of Human Movement Science, Incheon National University, Incheon, South Korea; Neuromechanical Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Incheon National University, Incheon, South Korea.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2025 May;134:107779. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107779. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
Although growing evidence suggests that aerobic exercise has beneficial effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), it remains unclear which specific aerobic exercise regimen optimizes improvement in these symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the effects of aerobic exercise on motor function in patients with PD according to exercise intervention protocols.
Through 28 qualified studies with randomized controlled trials, we assessed motor function using either the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) III or Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS III as an outcome measure. We employed random effects meta-analysis models to obtain standardized mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Moderator variable analyses were conducted based on exercise type (aerobic exercise vs. aerobic-based combined exercise), duration (<60 min vs. ≥60 min per session), frequency (<four vs. ≥four sessions per week), period (<12 weeks vs. ≥12 weeks), and intensity (low-to-moderate vs. moderate-to-high).
Aerobic exercise interventions demonstrated significant improvements in overall motor function. Although all categories were significantly effective in improving motor function, aerobic-based combined exercise had a greater effect size on motor symptoms compared to aerobic exercise alone. Additionally, ≥60 min per session showed a significantly increased effect size compared to <60 min per session. The impact of aerobic exercise did not differ based on exercise frequency, period, or intensity.
Our observations suggest that aerobic-based combined exercise and exercise sessions lasting 60 min or longer may be associated with greater improvements in motor symptoms in patients with PD.
尽管越来越多的证据表明有氧运动对帕金森病(PD)患者的运动症状有有益影响,但尚不清楚哪种特定的有氧运动方案能最优化这些症状的改善。本研究旨在根据运动干预方案调查有氧运动对PD患者运动功能影响的差异。
通过28项合格的随机对照试验研究,我们使用统一PD评定量表(UPDRS)III或运动障碍协会-UPDRS III作为结局指标来评估运动功能。我们采用随机效应荟萃分析模型来获得标准化平均差和95%置信区间(CIs)。基于运动类型(有氧运动与有氧联合运动)、持续时间(每次<60分钟与≥60分钟)、频率(每周<4次与≥4次)、周期(<12周与≥12周)和强度(低至中度与中度至高)进行调节变量分析。
有氧运动干预显示总体运动功能有显著改善。尽管所有类别在改善运动功能方面均显著有效,但与单独的有氧运动相比,有氧联合运动对运动症状的效应量更大。此外,与每次<60分钟相比,每次≥60分钟显示效应量显著增加。有氧运动的影响在运动频率、周期或强度方面没有差异。
我们的观察结果表明,有氧联合运动和持续60分钟或更长时间的运动可能与PD患者运动症状的更大改善相关。